Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Husky Energy Inc. cumulative redeemable preferred T.HSE.PR.B



TSX:HSE.PR.B - Post by User

Comment by autofocus111on Apr 20, 2019 11:07pm
105 Views
Post# 29651830

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Even Cenovus is Doing Better than Husky!!

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Even Cenovus is Doing Better than Husky!!mrbb Yes SU was opposed to oil production curtailments, but not necessarily because they want low WCS prices. Quite the opposite actually. I might be mistaken, but I believe that SU, unlike HSE, produces more oil than their refineries can process. They export the excess bitumen and syncrude oil to USA (and have contracted pipeline capactiy to do that), so in that regard they would prefer WCS pricesto be high, not low. I believe the ideal situation for SU is actually high WCS prices combined with high crack spreads, so they profit from both those oil exports and their internal refining. Since they are a net exporter of oil (oil production exceeds refining capacity), they oppose curtailments because they want to continue to raop bitumen produciton to boost revenues from those oil exports.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>