RE:From Stockhouse... changes coming on Nov. 28th!Who would be watching the watchers, i.e. the "community Management Team members?
This new Stricter Compliance to Community Policies is meant to lend itself to abuse and censorship orchestrated by a few against the many
This is exactly how freely provided information, uniquely conveyed opinion, reasonable conjecture, discussion generally, etc., is intentionally silenced.
It's also how opinion is clearly disingenuously shaped to serve ulterior motives being perhaps facilitated by and propagated forward by or on behalf of certain members of Stockhouse investors bulletin board administration and/or those principal persons vested of and ultimately exercising control of "Stockhouse". Who is the controlling shareholder of "Stockhouse", "the corporation"?
The same five people utilizing phantom accounts and alias chracters elect target one particular poster and have such a poster suspended by "community Management Team members, i.e. individuals who could be biased toward what one poster conveys versus another poster.
Who controls the un restrained bias and abuses of power over bulletin board conversation exerted by "community Management Team members"?
I am always polite when being treated politely and always respond in conversation in a manner which entirely reflects precisely how I am spoken to, i.e. I am kind and considerate when being treated kindly and considerately and yet, I can be just as nasty when being treated in a nasty way by some nasty poster.
Are we participants considered children here, who need to be protected? Are we to be treated like children in order to satiate the will of certain far too manipulative adults (warning here, I'm conveying a actual "opinion" in stating the following observation) who simply have gone woke or can be considered by others to have become "snowflakes" so to speak?