RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:$1 soon Right because all the other companies whose stock you own don't have to report risks in their MD&As. You obviously failed to interpret these "risks" properly. You also clearly haven't done your homework since the annual report paints a completely different picture.
From the annual report:
The Company’s primary source of revenue is from new rail tank car builders and retrofit/repair customers. The Company is confident that the demand for our current EP RV products and new KKM technology will continue to improve in future periods. Indicators in the rail industry suggest that the demand for new tank car builds will grow steadily during 2015 and growth in that area should provide us with steady growth in sales revenue. As such management expects that the demand on our liquidity and capital resources will increase in a material way in the short term. The Company is very fortunate to have negotiated very favorable payment terms with its largest customers and this will ease some of the added burden on our liquidity and capital resources
The Company is currently experiencing rapid growth in sales and profitabilit y due to the increasing demand placed on the railroad industry as a result of developments in the oil and gas transportation business. The controversy over pipelines has helped our business immensely and we expect the demand to remain high for years to come. The Company expects to generate revenue of approximately $36 ,000,000 during the year ended December 31, 2015 and expects its margins to remain around 46% which would be consistent with recent financial reporting periods. The Company’s gross revenue for the year ended December 30 , 2014 was $23,816,809. The Company is not aware of any events that may materially affect our business w ith the exception of the ever growing interest by OEM producers and shipping companies in our KKM system. The Company is expecting to recei ve significant orders in 2015. This is expected to generate greater revenues and in crease our margins.
Furthermore, if you think the current stock price justifies 3 years of growth at 50%, you're smoking something good. A multiple of 3 P/S and 15 P/E makes perfect sense for a 50% grower as you suggest..... I'm absolutely spechless. There's just no way you're serious.
I won't be responding to you anymore because I just think you're trying to shake the tree. Good luck with your goals.