Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

K92 Mining Inc. T.KNT

Alternate Symbol(s):  KNTNF

K92 Mining Inc owns and operates the high-grade Kainantu Gold Mine in Papua New Guinea which is currently operating at a design annualized production rate of approximately 120,000 oz AuEq per annum and is expected to produce at a run-rate of +300,000 oz AuEq per annum following its Stage 3 Expansion.


TSX:KNT - Post by User

Comment by BlindBoyon Jun 18, 2021 9:30am
155 Views
Post# 33410420

RE:Q2 record

RE:Q2 record thanks bjorn ... K92 continues to prove itself to be an exempliary company, both in terms of its mining performance and conduct, and it's belief and adherence (by example) to community, environmental and social values. 

This is in stark contrast to the previous owner/operator of the K92 mine who sold the property to Barrick, prior to the acquisition by KNT.  That would be Highlands Pacific.

Our new neighbour to the north and south, Kainantu Resources, recently also acquired leases near the proposed Frieda River mine location (NW of Porgera, which is NW of K92).  While doing some homework, I found that a 20% owner of the Frieda River project was Highlands Pacific was Highlands Pacific, and that 20 years ago, Highlands Pacific had planned to dump waste directly into the ocean.

" NEWS RELEASE August 31, 2001

Highlands Pacific, the Australian mining company planning to dump waste into a bay near Madang on the north coast of Papua New Guinea, has had its badly flawed plans exposed.

Based on a leaked report, the PNG Independent newspaper today revealed the company's plans and the environmental plan for the waste dumping are so inadequate that no realistic assessment can be made of the mine's impact.

Highlands Pacific Ramu Nickel Mine if built will pipe 100 million tons of waste into the sea at Astrolabe Bay, the home of PNG 's multi-million dollar tuna fishery and a prime tourist destination because of its rich coral reefs.

"It is totally unacceptable for an Australian mining company to be proposing to dump waste into the sea, especially on the basis of the woefully inadequate environmental assessment done for it" said Mr. Geoff Evans, Director of the Mineral Policy Institute.

The Mineral Policy Institute's report "A Review of Risks Presented by The Ramu Nickel Project to the Ecology of Astrolabe Bay, Papua New Guinea" was commissioned by the Lutheran Church in PNG, with scientific assessment carried out by scientists from James Cook University, Flinders University and the Australian Institute of Marine Science.

The report shows that, in the opinions of the Mineral Policy Institute report's reviewing scientists, there may be deficiencies in the environmental plan regarding potential impacts of disposal of wastes from the proposed Ramu mine's processing plant, including:

The evidence in the new report leads to a conclusion that the risks associated with the Ramu Project's Submarine Tailings Disposal in Astrolabe Bay are significantly greater than the company's plan indicates, including the likelihood of contaminating the local reef system and parts of Astrolabe Bay with mine waste.

"Highlands Pacific plans could create another Ok Tedi style disaster. The best that can be said about its proposal is that there is simply no credible information about the impact."

"In the same week as 30,000 Ok Tedi and Fly River landowners get the legal go-ahead to sue BHP in Australia, another Australian mining company is once again engaged in irresponsible development, pushing a proposal which would be rejected as fatally flawed in Australia," Mr. Evans concluded."

 



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>