RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Insider trading. QContinuum1 wrote: Actually you lost yourself. Your OP seemed to suggest that LABS mgmt were into some darker things given stock purchases etc etc and that somehow it tied to 'contracts' that you think have been signed.
They have done nothing illegal and posting their share history doesn't prove a damn thing.
the only point i was making with my initial post was that management hasent purchased a single share on the open market, if they thought the shares were so undervalued they could have shown shareholders that they believe in the company by making some insider buys. no mention of any accusations of illegality or impropriaty by management on my part...so take a breath guy!
then someone chimed in and told me they werent alowed to buy because they were sitting on material info that has not been released (blackout) and it would be
illegal the only reason i posted the sells is that if they cant buy they cant sell and as proof i posted the Sedi chart
i havent done anything other than to back up my initial argument with proof !!
and posting the history proves it !!! are you one of those that dosent like facts?