Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Largo Inc T.LGO

Alternate Symbol(s):  LGO

Largo Inc. is a Canada-based producer and supplier of vanadium products. The Company’s segments include sales & trading, mine properties, corporate, exploration and evaluation properties (E&E properties), Largo Clean Energy and Largo Physical Vanadium. Its VPURE and VPURE+ products, which are sourced from one of the vanadium deposits at the Company's Maracas Menchen Mine in Brazil. The Company... see more

TSX:LGO - Post Discussion

Largo Inc > My quick observation: Q4 earnings were the worst of 2023.
View:
Post by kha341 on Mar 21, 2024 8:23pm

My quick observation: Q4 earnings were the worst of 2023.

All in US$


1) FY Revenue 12% better than expectation


Actual FY-23 annual revenue = $199M or 12% better than the analyst consensus of $177.3M

Revenue consensus


2) FY Earnings Per Share (EPS) way lower than expectation 


Actual Q1-23 EPS = ($0.02)

Actual Q2-23 EPS = ($0.09)

Actual Q3-23 EPS = ($0.19)

Actual Q4-23 EPS = ($0.21) The worst Q of 2023

Actual FY-23 EPS = ($0.51)


Actual FY-23 EPS = ($0.51) or 40% worst than the analyst consensus of ($0.363)

Actual Q4-23 EPS = ($0.21) or 382% worst than the analyst consensus of ($0.05)



EPS Consensus

3) Operating costs


Actual FY-23 Operating Costs = $174.8M or 88% of Revenue.
FY-23 Gross margin = 12%. 

Actual Q4-23 Operating Costs = $43.2M or 98% of Revenue

Q4-23 Gross margin = 2% .
Note: We are not talking about Net Margin (i.e after deduction of ALL costs incurred by the company but only Gross Margin. A 12% Gross Margin is ridiculous (to say the least), never mind a 2%.

The operating costs are prohibitively high. And we are not even taking into consideration SG&A and other corporate / development / LCE support / misc costs. 

No company can stay afloat in such a red sea forever. 


4) Conclusion
 

Largo’s CEO: “While vanadium appears to have very promising long-term fundamentals, the Company remains solely focused on reducing costs and meeting its production and sales targets to withstand the current period of low vanadium prices.”


Sales are dependent on the prices of V which fluctuate based on factors beyond management control.

Costs are mostly within the control of management. 

With Q4-23 Gross Margin at a ridiculous rate of 2% of Revenue, it was obvious that management cost reduction effort was a total failure then. But that was the past. With regard to 2024, we already know that the V prices are even lower in Q1-24 than in the challenging year of 2023. On a forward looking view, here is what I’m worried about:
Will management be able to deliver on its promise of reducing costs in a way that is good enough to keep Largo afloat if the “
current period of low vanadium prices” persists?


 

DYODD


Comment by ThaLuvDocta on Mar 21, 2024 9:06pm
Let's not forget that China is using stimulus measures to buff the economy and the property sector. I didn't see you mention anything at all about ilmenite, vrfb, the JV, and PGM (which you also believed to be significant in an earlier post). Just the other day you called this a potential 10 bagger by '25/'26. It's fine though if you're trying to drop the price more; I' ...more