Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

LAKE SHORE GOLD CORP 6.25 PCT DEBS T.LSG.DB



TSX:LSG.DB - Post by User

Post by rockmstockmon Jan 27, 2014 10:08pm
218 Views
Post# 22140438

harveyorgan.blogspot.ca

harveyorgan.blogspot.ca

Is a Major Gold Scandal Going Mainstream?

/www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/01/major-gold-scandal-going-mainstream.html" rel="noindex nofollow" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px currentColor; color: rgb(136, 136, 136); vertical-align: baseline; background-color: transparent;" title="4:48 am" target="_blank">byWashingtonsBlog

Allegation that Central Banks Have Rehypothecated, Leased or Outright Sold the Gold They Claim to Have Is Gaining Momentum

We noted in 2012 that there are serious questions as to whether the Fed and other central banks really have the gold holdings which they claim.
This story is starting to go mainstream.
The Financial Times writes today (h/t Zero Hedge):

A year ago the Bundesbank announced that it intended to repatriate 700 tons of Germany’s gold from Paris and New York. Although a couple of jumbo jets could have managed the transatlantic removal, it made security sense to ship the load in smaller consignments. Just how small, and over how long, has only just become apparent.
Last month Jens Weidmann, Bundesbank president, admitted that just 37 tons had arrived in Frankfurt. The original timescale, to complete the transfer by 2020, was leisurely enough, but at this rate it would take 20 years for a simple operation. Well, perhaps not so simple. While he awaits delivery, Herr Weidmann is welcome to come and look through the bars in the Federal Reserve’s vaults, but the question is: whose bars are they?
In the “armchair farmer” fraud you are told: “Look, this is your pig, in the sty.” It works until everyone wants physical delivery of their pig, which is why Buba’s move last year caused such a stir. After all nobody knows whether there are really 260m ounces of gold in Fort Knox, because the US government won’t let auditors inside.
The delivery problem for the Fed is a different breed of pig. The gold market is far more than exchanging paper money for precious metal. Indeed the metal seems something of a sideshow. In June last year the average volume of gold cleared in London hit 29m ounces per day. The world’s mines are producing 90m ounces per year. The traded volume was many times the cleared volume.
The paper gold in the London Bullion Market takes the familiar forms that bankers have turned into profit machines: futures, options, leveraged trades, collateralised obligations, ETFs . . . a storm of exotic instruments, each of which is carefully logged, cross-checked and audited.
Or perhaps not. High-flying traders find such backroom work tedious, and prefer to let some drone do it, just as they did with those money-market instruments that fuelled the banking crisis. The drones will have full control of the paper trail, won’t they? There’s surely no chance that the Fed’s little delivery difficulty has anything to do with the cat’s-cradle of pledges based on the gold in its vaults?
John Hathaway suspects there is. He worries about all the paper (and pixels) linked to gold. He runs the Tocqueville gold fund (the clue is in the name) and doesn’t share the near-universal gloom of London’s gold analysts, who a year ago forecast an average $1700 for 2013. It is currently $1,260.
As has been remarked here before, forecasting the price is for mugs and bugs. But one day the ties that bind this pixelated gold may break, with potentially catastrophic results. So if you fancy gold at today’s depressed price, learn from Buba and demand delivery.

And last week, Glenn Beck – hate him or love him, he’s got the 594th most popular website in the world and many viewers on Dish network and various cable providers – did an entire 20-minute episode on the issue:
www/washington.blog.com
This story hasn’t yet made it to the New York Times, the Washington Post or network television … but it is gaining momentum.
end

Huge gold demand!!
(courtesy zero hedge)

Scrambling Gold Mints Around The World Plead: "We Can’t Meet The Demand, Even If We Work Overtime"

Tyler Durden's picture





One of the big disconnects over the past year has been the divergence between the price of paper gold and the seemingly inexhaustible demand for physical gold, from China all the way to the US mint. Today we get a hint on how this divergence has been maintained: it now appears the main culprit is the massive boost in supply by gold mints around the world working literally 24/7, desperate to provide enough supply to meet demand at depressed prices in order to avoid a surge in price as bottlenecked supply finally catches up with unprecedented physical demand.
Bloomberg reports that "global mints are manufacturing as fast as they can after a 28 percent drop in gold prices last year, the biggest slump since 1981, attracted buyers of physical metal. The demand gains helped bullion rally for five straight weeks, the longest streak since September 2012. That won’t be enough to stem the metal’s slump according to Morgan Stanley, while Goldman Sachs Group predicts bullion will "grind lower" over 2014." Odd - one could make the precisely opposite conclusion - once mints run out of raw product, the supply will slow dramatically forcing prices much higher and finally letting true demand manifest itself in the clearing price.
More from Bloomberg:

/www.zerohedge.com/sites/all/modules/blockquote/images/menu-leaf.gif");">

/www.zerohedge.com/sites/all/modules/blockquote/images/menu-leaf.gif");">
“The long-term physical buyers see these price drops as opportunities to accumulate more assets,” said Michael Haynes, the chief executive officer of American Precious Metals Exchange, an online bullion dealer. “We have witnessed some top selling days in the past few weeks.”
The propaganda is well-known: “Prices are likely to drop further as global economic conditions are stabilizing and tapering worries continue,” said Rob Haworth, a senior investment strategist in Seattle at U.S. Bank Wealth Management, which oversees about $110 billion of assets. “There is no doubt that physical demand has improved, but it will not be enough to support prices." Uhm, yeah. That makes no sense: what happens when global mints are hit by capacity bottlenecks from gold miners for whom it is becoming increasingly more economic to just halt production at sub-cost levels.
Meanwhile, here is a case study of how individual mints are working overtime to plug the unprecedented demand comes from Austria:

/www.zerohedge.com/sites/all/modules/blockquote/images/menu-leaf.gif");">

/www.zerohedge.com/sites/all/modules/blockquote/images/menu-leaf.gif");">
Austria’s mint is running 24 hours a day as global mints from the U.S. to Australia report climbing demand for gold coins even while Goldman Sachs Group Inc. says this year’s price rebound will end.
Austria’s Muenze Oesterreich AG mint hired extra employees and added a third eight-hour shift to the day in a bid to keep up with demand. Purchases of bullion coins at Australia’s Perth Mint rose 20 percent this year through Jan. 20 from a year earlier. Sales by the U.S. Mint are set for the best month since April, when the metal plunged into a bear market.
It's not just Austria. Presenting the US Mint:

/www.zerohedge.com/sites/all/modules/blockquote/images/menu-leaf.gif");">
/www.zerohedge.com/sites/all/modules/blockquote/images/menu-leaf.gif");">
The U.S. Mint, the world’s largest, sold 89,500 ounces so far this month. The Austrian mint that makes Philharmonic coins, saw sales jump 36 percent last year and expects “good business” for the next couple of months, Andrea Lang, the marketing and sales director of Austria’s Muenze Oesterreich AG, said in an e-mail.
“The market is very busy,” Lang said. “We can’t meet the demand, even if we work overtime.”
The price for the Austrian mint’s 1-ounce Philharmonic gold coin slumped 27 percent last year, according to data from the Certified Coin Exchange.
“It’s been a very bad year for gold,” said Frank McGhee, the head dealer at Integrated Brokerage Services LLC in Chicago. “People who bought coins have lost value, but they are not looking at short-term gains, and hope springs eternal.”

Tell that to China.
That said, keep an eye on GLD ETF holdings - for now the biggest marginal setter of gold price remains the paper ETF, whose "physical" gold holdings have cratered in the past year. Once this resumes going higher, buy.
end
China's imports from Hong Kong confirm Koos Jansen numbers:
(courtesy Ananthalakshmi)
/www.lemetropolecafe.com/places/china" rel="noindex nofollow" target="_blank">China imported about 1,158.162 tonnes from Hong Kong, compared with 557.478 tonnes in 2012, overtaking India to become the world's biggest gold buyer.
Demand for gold jewellery, bars and coins jumped as prices fell 28 percent last year, the first annual decline after a 12-year bull run.
Robust Chinese demand has helped provide a floor to prices, which have been dropping as a shift in U.S. Federal Reserve policy towards curbing monetary stimulus has reduced the appeal of gold as a safe haven and as gold-backed exchange-traded funds have been hit by big outflows.
China's rising demand has helped counter a drop in demand in India, where a high current account deficit has forced the government to impose curbs on gold imports.
Net gold flows into China climbed to 94.847 tonnes in December from 76.393 tonnes in November, according to data e-mailed to Reuters by the Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department.
Total imports from Hong Kong - including purchases later re-sold to Hong Kong - were 126.644 tonnes, up from 107.357 tonnes in November.
"There are strong numbers to finish off the year, and we expect we could see an even higher figure for January," Victor Thianpiriya, an analyst at ANZ, said.
Imports rose as banks stocked up to meet peak demand for the Chinese New Year in late January, traders said.
Thianpiriya and other analysts do not expect China to continue buying at the same pace in 2014, however, largely because they consider the huge drop in prices to be a one-off and because retailers and dealers are now well stocked.
ANZ expects 900 tonnes of imports into China from Hong Kong in 2014, which would still be the second-highest level on record.
China does not publish gold trade data. The numbers from Hong Kong, a main conduit for gold into China, give the best picture of Chinese trade in the precious metal.
China has also been importing directly into the mainland, global trade data has shown, as banks have imported bullion to meet strong demand. (Reporting by A. Ananthalakshmi;
end




With India's elections in April the ruling clan need to remove gold's restrictions if they want a chance of winning


(courtesy zero hedge)





span>

As you know, the stock markets took a big hit this past week and emerging markets and currencies were blowing up left and right. I was reading a Zerohedge article regarding subprime home loans (and autos) where Jeff Gundlach is making a repeat call of Kyle Bass's 2007 housing bubble/subprime implosion call https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-24/second-subprime-bubble-bursting-gundlach-warns . The article mentioned that 8 million homes are still stuck in the "shadow inventory" and how some homeowners have not even made one payment in 4 years. As I read down into the comments section there were questions and comments regarding this and the dropping equity markets...the question arose, "will Kyle Bass go short again?" and "will Jeff Gundlach put his money where his mouth is?".
I got to thinking about this and thought to myself "why". Why would anyone who truly understands what is happening go "short" now? Yes of course, because many of these markets are going to implode and the "shorts" will "win". But what exactly will they win? What if the markets do actually enter an "unscheduled holiday" because downside momentum picks up and it gets to a point where there are only offers and no bids...and they CAN'T open the markets? Will these shorts be jumping up and down singing "kumbayah we won" and partying like it's 1999? I have just a few questions that might enter a few minds.
Questions like how will you be settled? If the other side of your trade is broke...who pays you? Most importantly, "what" do you win? Let me put this in perspective for you. Let's go back in time to 1918 to '23 Weimar Germany and assume that an astute trader shorted the stock of a bank, German bonds or even the currency itself (if that was even possible back then). Whoever put this trade on was a "winner", a BIG winner! In some cases the asset actually went to zero and the short never needed to be covered because "zero is zero", they "won" their bet 100%. But what did they win? They won Reichmarks, lots and lots of Reichmarks! ...but there was a small problem with this "BIG win". When all was said and done, it took something like 2.3 trillion Reichmarks to purchase just one ounce of gold so what were "lots and lots of Reichmarks worth?
Do you see the problem here? Bass, Gundlach, Soros or any of the other great speculators may indeed "short the world" and win but they will be "paid" in dollars or other fiat. If (when) we do hyperinflate which mathematically looks to be assured then what are their "winnings" worth? Even if they do get paid by a counterparty that survives and has the ability to settle, what happens to these winnings when the dollar (or other fiat) is either grossly devalued or even replaced? In the case of Weimar Germany, how well off was the speculator who shorted 1 trillion (an enormous and unthinkable number in 1920) of German bonds and won 100% of the bet? Less than 1/2 ounce of gold...that's how "well off"! If I'm not mistaken, 1 Reichmark equaled .50 cents in 1918 and an ounce of gold was $20 so it took 40 Reichmarks to purchase 1 ounce of gold before the hyperinflation began.
Am I saying that gold is going into the $ trillions? No of course not but I do want to caution you that it certainly could happen. Given the current federal debt and future entitlement obligations, couple this with the possibility (odds better than 50%???) that we no longer have a gold hoard in Ft. Knox, an overleveraged economy and financial system that has been driven, steered and buoyed for years by a derivatives market that is over $1 quadrillion ...and top it off by a central bank with the ability to print dollars in unlimited quantities means that it is possible for the dollar to actually go to zero. Overly dramatic? Yes most probably but I wanted to illustrate the point that the conditions exist for the dollar to do what every single "pure" fiat currency has done throughout history...on a very grand scale...devalue at a minimum (until changed or altered) and actually die in the end game.
If you look at Zimbabwe, Venezuela or Argentina (the hyperinflation poster children) you will see that their stock markets have gone up dramatically, exponentialy. Is this because business is so good? No, they are all in a depression where many goods even as simple as toilet paper are unavailable. Their stock markets have gone "up" only in terms of their local currencies...but down versus "REAL THINGS"! This is the crux of what you need to understand, it doesn't matter if you "win" Zimbabwe dollars, Venzuelan bolivars, Argentine pesos or even U.S. dollars because they will/are devaluing to zero purchasing power.
I guess the best way to put this is "it doesn't matter how much you win...it only matters 'what' you win"! Regards, Bill H
and this economic lesson from Bill:
(courtesy Bill Holter/Miles Franklin)
I recently came across a very good question that pertains to the "inflation/deflation" question. The question is as follows ..."could you shed some light on the Money Velocity vs the Money supply….. who cares how much the fed prints and gives to a big bank like Wells Fargo and they stash it in their vaults to make their balance sheets. You guys and all gold sellers always whine about “Printing Money”…. but who Cares!….. if the man on Main Street is living from paycheck to paycheck….and in fact the money Velocity M2 chart shows a net decrease since 1996 by about 30%? I think that's why the gold and silver are worth less…who cares about the national debt if the red clicking numbers you print daily are going into a vault…might as well put it in a hole. I'm confused."


/www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2014/Midas/0127/B.png" width="630">
/www.lemetropolecafe.com/img2014/Midas/0127/C.png" width="630">
span>
First, the Fed can lower deposit rates to zero from the current .25% that they are paying the banks on deposits. This would force the banks to do "something" with their "parked" and idle free reserves. One would have thought that "movement" would have already begun but it has not, maybe because it "easy money" for the banks or maybe they still remember 2008-2009 and still fear any and all counter party risk? The problem as I see it is that moving to absolute "zero" would be like flipping a light switch, it's either on or it's off as there is no "in between". In this respect the Fed would basically be "all in" with both feet on the gas while throwing the brake pedal out the window. Using this last bullet would basically be an admission of total defeat and the currency itself would collapse in a hyperinflationary seizure as the banks are forced to "use" their tsunami of dollars.
Secondly and something that we are already seeing is that "cash" is actually beginning to "move". No way you say? "There is no money on the streets" and "just look at the velocity chart, there is no evidence of it turning up"...yes I agree but what are foreigners doing with their dollars? Judging by the last 6 months or so, they are spending their dollars on our real estate. That's right, dollars are coming back home in exchange for real estate. It's been reported that 40% of all U.S. sales were done with cash, in fact, last month saw 60% of all Florida closings done without any financing! Yes I am sure that much of this activity is simply "washing" some dirty money and making it "clean" but it shows the money being "spent" which is a murmur in velocity. I view this as an "early" act of "getting out" of dollars... I believe that foreigners are spending these dollars "while they still can".
For China's part, they have done two quite distinctive things over the last few years. They have signed many trade deals that exclude the use of dollars while at the same time done deals where they are the "purchaser" of real assets and in nearly all cases the contracted "payment" is in dollars. Does this sound like a nation hoarding dollars or one that is trying to bleed down their balances?
I mention all of the above because velocity which has been declining for over 15 years is a funny duck in that it can change course literally overnight. I don't believe that it will take any huge event to change the current mindset, "spending, bailing, dumping" dollars by foreigners has already started. You see, the "inflation" (or the fuel for it) has already been created and packed into the system. The hyperinflation that I speak of so often will be a "lack of confidence" event where dollars get spent for anything and everything. This lack of confidence will also be seen on the other side where the acceptance of dollars becomes reluctant...which then will become self reinforcing.
Hyperinflation (which in reality is a panic out of a currency) can literally happen overnight with little or no warning just as stock market crashes occur. Think back to late August 1987, the conditions were ripe for a crash but anyone who called for one was laughed at. Less than 2 months later the market had been cut in half. Now, the conditions are ripe for a dollar panic that cannot nor will be stopped once it begins. We don't even need any more QE or additional money supply, it has already been created. The only thing lacking for the greatest hyperinflation in all of history to begin is a break in confidence. Put simply, "velocity" (the 'selling' of dollars) will turn up once confidence finally breaks. Once turned, velocity will go straight up and the Fed will have no chance at "draining reserves" as the market size of dollars dwarfs the their ability to sop up the liquidity. Once confidence breaks...it won't nor can be restored and the sale of dollars won't stop until a new substitute currency is introduced. Your job is to get from here...to there...with your wealth still intact. Regards,
Bill H.
end

Guest Post: The Big Reset, Part 2

Tyler Durden's picture






Submitted by Koos Jansen of In Gold We Trust
The Big Reset, Part 2
This is part two of a Q&A with Willem Middelkoop about his new book The Big Reset. In his book a chapter on the ‘War on Gold’ takes a prominent position. Willem has been writing about the manipulation of the gold price since 2002 based on information collected by GATA since the late 1990’s. So part two of our interview will focus on this topic.
The War On Gold
Why Does The US Fight Gold?
The US wants its dollar system to prevail for as long as possible. It therefore has every interest in preventing a ‘rush out of dollars into gold’. By selling (paper) gold, bankers have been trying in the last few decades to keep the price of gold under control. This war on gold has been going on for almost one hundred years, but it gained traction in the 1960's with the forming of the London Gold Pool. Just like the London Gold Pool failed in 1969, the current manipulation scheme of gold (and silver prices) cannot be maintained for much longer.
What is the Essence Of The War on Gold
The survival of our current financial system depends on people preferring fiat money over gold. After the dollar was taken of the gold standard in 1971, bankers have tried to demonetize gold. One of the arguments they use to deter investors from buying gold and silver is that these metals do not deliver a direct return such as interest or dividends. But interest and dividend are payments to compensate for counterparty risk – the risk that your counterparty is unable to live up to its obligations. Gold doesn’t carry that risk. The war on gold is, in essence, an endeavor to support the dollar. But this is certainly not the only reason. According to a number of studies, the level of the gold price and the general public’s expectations of inflation are highly correlated. Central bankers work hard to influence inflation expectations. A 1988 study by Summers and Barsky confirmed that the price of gold and interest rates are highly correlated, as well with a lower gold price leading to lower interest rates.
When Did the War on Gold Start?
The first evidence of US meddling in the gold market can be found as early as 1925 when the Fed falsified information regarding the Bank of England’s possession of gold in order to influence interest rate levels. However, the war on gold only really took off in the 1960's when trust in the dollar started to fray. Geopolitical conflicts such as the building of the Berlin Wall, the Cuban Missile Crisis and the escalation of violence in Vietnam led to increasing military spending by the US, which in turn resulted in growing US budget deficits. A memorandum from 1961 entitled ‘US Foreign Exchange Operations: Needs and Methods’ described a detailed plan to manipulate the currency and gold markets via structural interventions in order to support the dollar and maintain the gold price at $ 35 per ounce. It was vital for the US to ‘manage’ the gold market; otherwise countries could exchange their surplus dollars for gold and then sell these ounces on the free gold market for a higher price.
How Was The Gold Price Managed In The 1960's?
During meetings of the central bank presidents at the BIS in 1961, it was agreed that a pool of $ 270 million in gold would be made available by the eight participating (western) countries. This so-called ‘London Gold Pool’ was focused on preventing the gold price from rising above $ 35 per ounce by selling official gold holdings from the central banks gold vaults. The idea was that if investors attempted to flee to the safe haven of gold, the London Gold Pool would dump gold onto the market in order to keep the gold price from rising. During the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, for instance, at least $ 60 million in gold was sold between 22 and 24 October. The IMF provided extra gold to be sold on the market when needed. In 2010, a number of previously secret US telex reports from 1968 weremade public by Wikileaks. These messages describe what had to be done in order to keep the gold price under control. The aim was to convince investors that it was completely pointless to speculate on a rise in the price of gold. One of the reports mentions a propaganda campaign to convince the public that the central banks would remain ‘the masters of gold’. Despite these efforts, in March 1968, the London Gold Pool was disbanded because France would no longer cooperate. The London gold market remained closed for two weeks. In other gold markets around the world, gold immediately rose 25% in value. This can happen again when the COMEX will default.
More Evidence About This Manipulation?
From the transcript of a March 1978 Fed-meeting, we know that the manipulation of the gold price was a point of discussion at that time. During the meeting Fed Chairman Miller pointed out that it was not even necessary to sell gold in order to bring the price down. According to him, it was enough to bring out a statement that the Fed was intending to sell gold.
Because the US Treasury is not legally allowed to sell its gold reserves, the Fed decided in 1995 to examine whether it was possible to set up a special construction whereby so-called ‘gold swaps’ could bring in gold from the gold reserves of Western central banks. In this construction, the gold would be ‘swapped’ with the Fed, which would then be sold by Wall Street banks in order to keep prices down. Because of the ‘swap agreement’, the gold is officially only lent out, so Western central banks could keep it on their balance sheets as ‘gold receivables’. The Fed started to informing foreign central bankers that they expected that the gold price to decline further, and large quantities of central banks’ gold became be available to sell in the open market. Logistically this was an easy operation, since the New York Fed vaults had the largest collection of foreign gold holdings. Since the 1930's, many Western countries had chosen to store their gold safely in the US out of fears of a German or Soviet invasion.
Didn't The British Help As Well By Unloading Gold At The Bottom Of The Market?
Between 1999 and 2002, the UK embarked on an aggressive selling of its gold reserves, when gold prices were at their lowest in 20 years. Prior to starting, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, announced that the UK would be selling more than half of its gold reserves in a series of auctions in order to diversify the assets of the UK’s reserves. The markets’ reaction was one of shock, because sales of gold reserves by governments had until then always taken place without any advance warning to investors. Brown was following the Fed’s strategy of inducing a fall in the gold price via an announcement of possible sales. Brown’s move was therefore not intended to receive the best price for its gold but rather to bring down the price of gold as low as possible. The UK eventually sold almost 400 tons of gold over 17 auctions in just three years, just as the gold market was bottoming out. Gordon Brown’s sale of the UK’s gold reserves probably came about following a request from the US. The US supported Brown ever since.
How Do They Manipulate Gold Nowadays?
The transition from open outcry (where traders stand in a trading pit and shout out orders) to electronic trading gave new opportunities to control financial markets. Wall Street veteran lawyer Jim Rickards presented a paper in 2006 in which he explained how ‘derivatives could be used to manipulate underlying physical markets such as oil, copper and gold’. In his bestseller entitled Currency Wars, he explains how the prohibition of derivatives regulation in the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (2000) had ‘opened the door to exponentially greater size and variety in these instruments that are now hidden off the balance sheets of the major banks, making them almost impossible to monitor’. These changes made it much easier to manipulate financial markets, especially because prices for metals such as gold and silver are set by trading future contracts on the global markets. Because up to 99% of these transactions are conducted on behalf of speculators who do not aim for physical delivery and are content with paper profits, markets can be manipulated by selling large amounts of contracts in gold, silver or other commodities (on paper). The $200 crash of the gold price April 12 and 15, 2013 is a perfect example of this strategy. The crash after silver reached $50 on May 1, 2011 is another textbook example.
For How Long Can This Paper-Gold Game Continue?
As you have been reporting yourself we can witness several indications pointing towards great stress in the physical gold market. I would be very surprised when the current paper gold game can be continued for another two years. This system might even fall apart in 2014. A default in gold and/or silver futures on the COMEX is a real possibility. It happened to the potato market in 1976 when a potato-futures default happened on the NYMEX. An Idaho potato magnate went short potatoes in huge numbers, leaving a large amount of contracts unsettled at the expiration date, resulting in a large number of defaulted delivery contracts. So it has happened before. In such a scenario futures contracts holders will be cash settled. So I expect the Comex will have to move to cash settlement rather than gold delivery at a certain point in the not too distant future. After such an event the price of gold will be set in Asian markets, like the Shanghai Gold Exchange. I expect gold to jump $1000 in a short period of time and silver prices could easily double overnight. That’s one of the reasons ourCommodity Discovery Fund invests in undervalued precious metal companies with large gold/silver reserves. They all have huge up-side potential in the next few years when this scenario will play out.
In Gold We Trust
Synopsis of The Big Reset: Now five years after the near fatal collapse of world’s financial system we have to conclude central bankers and politicians have merely been buying time by trying to solve a credit crisis by creating even more debt. As a result worldwide central bank’s balance sheets expanded by $10 trillion. With this newly created money central banks have been buying up national bonds so long term interest rates and bond yields have collapsed. But ‘parking’ debt at national banks is no structural solution. The idea we can grow our way back out of this mountain of debt is a little naïve. In a recent working paper by the IMF titled ‘Financial and Sovereign Debt Crises: Some Lessons Learned and Those Forgotten’ the economist Reinhart and Rogoff point to this ‘denial problem’. According to them future economic growth will ‘not be sufficient to cope with the sheer magnitude of public and private debt overhangs. Rogoff and Reinhart conclude the size of the debt problems suggests that debt restructurings will be needed ‘far beyond anything discussed in public to this point.’ The endgame to the global financial crisis is likely to require restructuring of debt on a broad scale.
About the author: Willem Middelkoop (1962) is founder of the Commodity Discovery Fund and a bestselling Dutch author, who has been writing about the world’s financial system since the early 2000s. Between 2001 and 2008 he was a market commentator for RTL Television in the Netherlands and also appeared on CNBC. He predicted the credit crisis in his first bestseller in 2007.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>