Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc T.MPVD

Alternate Symbol(s):  MPVDF

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. is a Canada-based diamond company. The Company’s primary asset is its 49% interest in the Gahcho Kue Mine, a Joint Venture with De Beers Canada. The Gahcho Kue Joint Venture property consists of several kimberlites that are actively being mined, developed, and explored for future development. The Company’s Kennady North Project includes approximately 113,000 hectares of claims and leases surrounding the Gahcho Kue Mine that include an indicated mineral resource for the Kelvin kimberlite and inferred mineral resources for the Faraday kimberlites. Kelvin is estimated to contain 13.62 million carats (Mct) at 8.50 million tons (Mt) at a grade of 1.60 carats/ton and a value of US$63/carat. Faraday 2 is estimated to contain 5.45Mct in 2.07Mt at a grade of 2.63 carats/ton and a value of US$140/ct. Faraday 1-3 is estimated to contain 1.90Mct to 1.87Mt at a grade of 1.04 carats/ton and a value of US$75/carat.


TSX:MPVD - Post by User

Comment by tinytoton Aug 09, 2018 7:42pm
103 Views
Post# 28437022

RE:RE:RE:RE:Share price

RE:RE:RE:RE:Share price
Mauriceopp wrote:
Macloud1 wrote: Really Maurice that is what you call a paper loss. They over 61 million in non cash expenses in there and as Tiny pointed out 8.1 million US transfered to the next quarter because thye were paid after June 31st.


Mac you don’t understand accounting. I am an accountant. The cost of those sales are also going to be reported in the 3rd quarter.


Cost Of Goods Sold Made Simple

Cost of goods sold (CGS) is adjusted according to any change in Finished Goods Inventory.

Finished goods inventory is evaluated at its Cost Of Production. (COP)

Examples:

For the Quarter you had sold 100 widgets for $100,000

Your beginning inventory was 0 widgets with 0 value

You produced 200 widgets at a cost of production of $20,000

Now obviously your Ending Inventory is 100 widgets valued at $10,000

Your cost of goods sold was cost of production plus or minus change in inventory value, CGS = COP +/- Change in Inventory. In this case, CGS = $20,000 - $10,000 increase in finished goods inventory value.

For the quarter you report:

Sales $100,000

Cost of goods sold $10,000

Now for the next quarter your beginning inventory is 100 widgets valued at $10,000

Your cost of sales for this new quarter will be dependent upon your cost of production AND THE VALUE OF YOUR ENDING INVENTORY.

If your ending inventory is 100 widgets, your CGS will be equal to your COP for the quarter. If you increase inventory, your CGS will be less than COP; and if you decrease inventory, your CGS will be greater than COP.

It is clear that costs associated with sales will sooner or later offset those sales, but it is far from clear when that will happen. These principles also apply to the accounting of raw materials inventory.



Bullboard Posts