Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nano One Materials Corp. T.NANO

Alternate Symbol(s):  NNOMF

Nano One is a technology company with a patented and scalable industrial process for the production of low cost, high performance cathode powders used in lithium ion batteries. These unique materials are being designed to add value to electric vehicles and grid storage batteries in the global push for a zero-emission future.


TSX:NANO - Post by User

Comment by Lawisfunon Jan 30, 2024 6:08pm
86 Views
Post# 35853784

RE:RE:RE:AN INTELLIGENT DISCUSSION OF NANO

RE:RE:RE:AN INTELLIGENT DISCUSSION OF NANOStarsearcher80, you do realize that you are the only one of all the people who post on both CEO.ca and Stockhouse that uses the same name/handle right? E.g., @jointstock=@contrap127; @specific=@patriotnano; etc.  Why do you continue to single me out for something that is commonplace?  There are no rules that everyone needs to use the same name on every forum they participate. 
 
You sound like you’re just extremely grumpy because you have been dead dead dead dead dead wrong about timing for Nano One success (and presumably, you have had your money locked in this investment for much much longer than you had anticipated).  I do feel sorry for your poor decision making but it’s not my fault.  So stop trying to pin your poor investment timing on me.  Take responsibility for your own actions and stop trying to point the finger at others.
 
Starseracher80, you never engage in our technical discussions so why don’t you just bug off and let us work on the technical topics we deem important.  If you are not interested then just put whoever you don’t like on ignore. 

There is enough room on this message board for everyone to discuss topics that are meaningful to each individual poster.  I have stated from day one I am skeptical of Nano One and that is my prerogative.  Why are you so scared of the questions and ideas I raise?  Do you have such little faith in your investment that you think discourse should be policed?     
 
We all know you are a forever bull and Nano success is always just imminent/around the corner.  You don’t need to continue to repeat the same refrain to your fan club.  Why don’t you just do us a favor and agree to only post when Nano actually achieves success rather than continue to remind us that success is imminent?  You have been wrong about timing Nano’s success so often you must feel some level of guilt for sucking so many others into this investment?  Or are you a complete sociopath? 
 
The rest of us have actual work to do trying to get the timing correct on this potential investment.  You can call me a clown all you want but you’re the joker that based his investment on emotions and timed his investment like an amateur.
 
Good luck to all the longs.    

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>