Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd T.NDM

Alternate Symbol(s):  NAK

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and development company based in Vancouver. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of mineral properties. The Company’s principal asset, owned through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pebble Limited Partnership, is a 100% interest in a contiguous block of about 1,840 mineral claims in Southwest Alaska... see more

TSX:NDM - Post Discussion

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd > Lower courts MIGHT consider, but…
View:
Post by RealityCheck123 on Mar 01, 2024 12:16pm

Lower courts MIGHT consider, but…

...the Clean Water Act applies to all lands within the US including State land.  Additionally, courts are unlikely to over rule a federal agency as long as all administrative steps were taken and nothing specifically contrary to law occurred.

The Dunleavy administration knows this and attempted to circumvent by filing with SCOTUS, but was rejected.

More importantly, the current mine plan is uneconomic. To move forward a new mine plan (underground only), 404 permit application and EIS is required.
Comment by 5Patrick5 on Mar 01, 2024 2:12pm
RC gets it wrong. The process was not followed. Even when Pebble got a favorable rating from the ACOE the EPA rode roughshod over the process, thereby violating constitutional private property rights.
Comment by robtcrt on Mar 01, 2024 2:22pm
Buddy why do you care so much?  Get a life and just move on.
Comment by RealityCheck123 on Mar 02, 2024 5:09pm
TSX:NDM - Post by User   Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd Bullboard Posts (2) ••• Post by robtcrton Jun 24, 2016 12:16am 166 Views  Post# 24994005 Shs 100,000
Comment by RealityCheck123 on Mar 01, 2024 2:51pm
The USACE provided the public with permit denial regulatory reasoning. There was no "favorable rating" otherwise a permit may have been issued with additional regulatory required submittals (CMP, T&E, etc.). It's obvious you do not understand US federal environmental law.  The Clean Water Act which both Alaska and the USACE administer applies to all lands, including " ...more  
Comment by bazbuz on Mar 02, 2024 2:34pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >
{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities