Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Verde AgriTech Ltd. T.NPK

Alternate Symbol(s):  VNPKF

Verde AgriTech Ltd is an agricultural technology company that produces potash fertilizers. The principal activity of the Company is the production and sale of a multi-nutrient potassium fertilizer marketed in Brazil under the brands K Forte and BAKS, Silicio Forte, and internationally as Super Greensand (the Product). K Forte is a potash fertilizer that is a source of potassium, silicon, and... see more

TSX:NPK - Post Discussion

Verde AgriTech Ltd. > 2020 Q4 Results
View:
Post by 15Stanmore on Mar 31, 2021 12:52pm

2020 Q4 Results

After 3 quarters of improving financial performance over the same quarter in 2019, Q4 2020 failed to keep up the trend. In spite of a significant increase in tonnes sold in the quarter (a 76% increase - 55,585 tonnes versus 32,221 tonnes in Q3 2019) , as well as in revenues realized (a 48% increase - $2,209,000 versus $1,491,000 in Q3 2019), the Company reported a net loss of $192,000 vesrsus a net loss of only $11,000 in 2019.

We understand that the Company has not yet been able to reduce the extreme volatility in the quarterly sales volumes, and that Q4 is the second lowest volume after Q1. However it is still over half the volume of Q3 and 5 times the volume in Q1. In addition, the 2020 Q4 generated a gross profit of $1,297,000, a significant starting point from which to cover "fixed" quarterly costs..

I am disappointed Management was unable to turn in a quarterly profit in Q4 2020 given these improved top line figures. By carefully controlling discretionary selling, delivery, general and administrative costs during the quarter, I believe this was easily within reach. Perhaps the recognition of part of Mr. Veloso's 2020 personal bonus of $551,000 (see page 60 of the 2020 Financial Statements) in the 4th Quarter (1/4 would be $137,750) contributed to the loss?

And do we know the basis of awarding Mr. Veloso a personal bonus of $551,000 (131.2% of his base salary of $420,000)? It certainly was not for producing a bottom line profit in Q4 2020. And what was behind the issuing of 750,000 ten year $1.22 stock options to Mr. Veloso in March 2021? Was this a reward for past performance, or was it an incentive to produce improved performance over the next ten years. I would normally put these questions to the Chairman of our Board of Directors, but as I found out today Verde Agritech has never had a Board Chair until Mr. Veloso personally assumed this critical position. So I am a bit hesitant about approaching the Board Chair to seek an explanationas to how the Board arrived at the compansation arrangements for the CEO when he and the CEO are one and the same. 
Comment by Ciao on Mar 31, 2021 1:15pm
What I can't really understand is the Product delivery freight expenses, sure they would be higher in absolute $ due to a higher volume of product sold in Q4 2020 vs previous year's quarter, but then they compare 2019 to 2020 and the %age CIF relative to sales has gone from 2% to 13%. There's something disproportionate in Q4. "Product delivery freight expenses Product delivery ...more  
Comment by Ciao on Apr 01, 2021 11:07am
Stan, as you are cruching through the numbers, perhaps you could have a look at the CIF and see if it makes sense to you. TIA
Comment by rodrabal on Apr 01, 2021 1:04pm
Starting to rethink my investment in this stock. For a ceo who preaches ethics ,seems like he is the only one making out like a bandit .using it like his own ATM machine. Not impressed 
Comment by Ciao on Apr 01, 2021 2:05pm
Now I question if the results were leaked out last week, given the one day with the highest yearly volume and the steep drop in the share price to $1.30 level.
Comment by Celt1967 on Apr 01, 2021 2:24pm
I'm going to resist over reacting until we can see the CEO and the white of his eyes when is answering those very same we all have on the tips of our tongues. It was only two months ago we were congratulating the CEO for his openness, candour and clarity in answering questions. Ever since 2007 our rash assumptions have (from time to time) been proven wrong and I'm quite sure this will also ...more  
Comment by MikPrecious on Mar 31, 2021 1:21pm
Very well said!!! totally agree!! this bonus is ludicrous!! way over the top!!
Comment by PedroPistacio on Mar 31, 2021 2:34pm
Just for clarity Stan, what is CV's basic salary in CAD$? And what bonus has he been awarded? Is the bonus by way of a defined number of shares, or cash, or in the form of LTIPs? We need to check on the process here. If the CEO is going to award himself 10% of revenue every year then we are going to have a problem. Thank you. 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities