Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Novo Resources Corp T.NVO

Alternate Symbol(s):  NSRPF

Novo Resources Corp. is engaged in evaluating, acquiring, exploring, and developing natural resource properties with a focus on gold. The Company explores and develops its prospective land package covering approximately 7,500 square kilometers in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, along with the 22 square kilometer Belltopper project in the Bendigo Tectonic Zone of Victoria, Australia. The Company operates through two segments: care & maintenance operations and exploration operations.


TSX:NVO - Post by User

Comment by ronreaganon Feb 24, 2021 9:00am
92 Views
Post# 32645223

RE:RE:On Jay Taylor

RE:RE:On Jay TaylorAgreed - we'll eventually get a bunch of "lagging" indicators, or PEAs, from lots of different spots in the Pilbara.

The question is When will potential investors in the broader market be able to "connect the dots" with a degree of certainty?

QH obviously has (c.f. 13,500+ sq km).

Existing Novo investors too. 

All curious about the potential Wits II on our hands.

In the meantime, detractors will be able to take cheap shots, sewing as much doubt/discord as possible. I wonder what they can say, substantively, about the fact that the same geological structure exists some 65 km or 300 km away? I hear no geological responses to that. But I do hear "TA don't lie". Useless.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>