NEW YORK TIMES HEADLINE: OLD FOX EXPOSED BY Tx I have been validated - Yep, right down the line consistent with my own conclusions. And I don't even want to disrespect Tx by adding any of my own commentary, as his is RIGHT ON (as usual). Read what Tx wrote back on August 22, 2020 (when I was first coming on the scene and wasn't really active here):
"What I find quite revealing is how a chart monkey has no issues referring to long past discussions on potential trajectories on the investment, without having any inputs or commentary at the time to what possibly lies ahead. For the growth dynamics of the business, and interesting details about the structure of the company(s) many of us are invested . And that illustrates my main point beautifully. Idiots such as Oldfk never miss an opportunity to reinforce it.
And I thoroughly enjoy abusing idiots. They offer no discussions on potential business developments, or story outcomes at any given time. No insights on how the moving parts within the investment may manifest themselves. They simply do not possess the intellect.
In addition, have you noticed how Oldfk completely avoids any arguments against post links like "Player Pattern Recognitions at the NVO game table" and such? The reason is simple: They state past events which actually occurred. It is the future that befuddles Oldfk most, and he can only comment upon on it when it passes and siips into the distant past. The farther back in the rear view mirror , the better , so that he can be 100% sure of his statements.
As investors (and not chart monkeys), we come here to discuss the future, and what it make look like from a specific vantage and reference point in time. All the posts I construct are designed to enhance insight and discussions on our future as investors , and not flip bananas around a cage as a screeching simpleton.
Go ahead all of you, try it yourself. Ask the chart monkey his opinion on where the company is going, the value of the investment 1 month, 3 months, or 6 months out, or on anything else pertaining to the corporate nature or quality of the prospects.
I will save you some time: Don't bother. He has no capabilities to offer any of that. He can only operate as a squealing buffoon from a position of hindsight.
The choices are yours to make as investors . Discuss the future today. Or regurgitate the past tomorrow. The former is our business, the latter is mostly irrelevant.
I suppose all of this will once again be noted as being bullish.
Such are the burdens carried by a superior investor.
Tx"