Tradeahead on bashers @Tradeahead @Fabrix72 As a shareholder, I do benefit from owning NVO. That is a legitimate, and very well declared economic interest. Contrary to many bashers in here, I speak the truth! - I am very meticulous about the truth, I care about it deeply, personally. Many bashers spawn lies and subterfuge with total disregard for truth, and you can tell me why that is???? That is one thing I am not entirely sure about?
Why would one spend much of ones time to lie, denigrate, bash and hate, a company in which one does not have an economic interest? I am curious, please tell me why?????
Is it not more likely that one of these factors are in play....
A) Corrupt financial players involved in illegal naked shorting of NVO and spreading lies to manipulate price, OR
B) Personal hate/economic disappointment plays into the picture, such as those who has been fired by NVO, or are unsatisfied with business arrangements they themselves entered into?? (Okay, I know this to be the case for 2 haters specifically, so not a question) OR
C) Competing companies or other players in the sector, would like to get access to NVOs assets, and a campaign against the company might be thought to cheapen that effort????? OR
D) People having failed in participating in a failed coup against the the company, trying to get even????
@Gasman If anybody were short AND honest, they would declare their economic interest by saying "I am short XYZ shares", as I have on the long side of things. In that case I and the board would understand their economic interests. But I guess honesty and fair play simply is asking too much????? 4 about an hour ago
@Tradeahead @mp07 You know, when I can buy between 600M (net HARD assets) and 1400M in (est. net assets & optionality), currently trading for 370M, that is buying 1 dollar for ~0,26 cents on the dollar, I will be positive to that proposition, because it will make me money in the future.
Because 100 years of investment performance (see Buffett, Graham, Klarman, and 50 others successful money managers) shows that precisely that is an almost always winning combination. A huge rebate, or margin of safety, yields market beating performance. How could it not???? The company could lose 3/4 of its assets and optionality, and still make the investors whole. Or achieve its growth plans and make the investor 400% or 600% net return.
It has worked for 100 years. And it will for 100 years to come.
Even better when it is a sector in a long term bull market. 1 28 minutes ago
@Tradeahead @Fabrix72 What I mean is what I wrote. A fellow shareholder, was being unfairly attacked, which I found shameless, that is why I joined. In other words: You bashers made me join!.
And to be specific: When I joined here I had never exchanged one single word with QH or anyone else with association to NVO, and I have no relation to NVO now, nor have I ever had one, and I have never received anything from NVO. I am a shareholder. Satisfied???? 0 8 minutes ago
@Tradeahead @Fabrix72 Board rules prevent me to comment on how stupid your assertion here really is. It is perfectly ethical to support a fellow shareholder exposed to an unfair and unbalanced attack by a horde of vicious haters. It is more than ethical, it should be commended. Of course we all know that no good deed goes unpunished, which your attacks is kind of proof of.