RE:RE:RE:RE:Institutional investor ""Defendants launched a public smear campaign against Nano and its management, driving down Nano’s share price so that Defendants could acquire even more shares at artificially reduced prices. Defendants again violated U.S. securities law disclosures designed precisely to alert the market to such activity.""
In our specific case... if anyone can answer my question based on this statement, what would be the purpose of acquiring more shares at a low price of a company that has no value with a product that does not has no future. At that point this company is doomed to go bankrupt and your millions of shares acquired at low cost will ultimately be worth $0.