RE:RE:RE:RE:An upside down viewpointMy comments were about Pilmer.and he has too many far flung ideas to waste time on all of them..
It was much easier to point out that the man cannot even garner respect in his acreddited field of geology nevermind in his unacredited sideline of climatology.
Here he is being discredited at both:
Volcanoes and CO2[edit]
Plimer has said that volcanic eruptions release more carbon dioxide (CO2) than human activity; in particular that submarine volcanoes emit large amounts of CO2 and that the influence of the gases from these volcanoes on the Earth's climate is under-represented in climate models.[48][49][50] The United States Geological Survey has calculated that human emissions of CO2 are about 130 times larger than volcanic emissions, including submarine emissions.[51][52][53] The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) stated that Plimer's claim "has no factual basis."[54] This was confirmed in a 2011 survey published in the Eos journal of the American Geophysical Union, which found that anthropogenic emissions of CO2 are 135 times larger than those from all volcanoes on Earth.[55]
I started to watch the video. It was condescending to say the least. He lost me at,"Demonic Social Media".
I wasn't sure that I should continue viewing him on the demonic platform on which he was appearing..
I am however sure that he is not a moderate and views the replacing of coal with natural gas as another evil
as he is the unbiased director of Queensland Coal Investments.. I am sure that it is clean coal.
I am never surprised by the amount of responses I get by people that have me on ignore. It is a flawed
control and they just can't help themselves.
Any way the world is embracing natural gas as a clean bridge fuel and its their view that seems to
matter at the moment as it has peaked global demand for the cleanist of fossil fuels like no other time
in history.
I am happy that Peyto can be there to help provide it at the best ESG levels in the industry.
GLTA
Oldnagger wrote: This is why I have had Quite Unessential on ignore for many months.His answer to everything is to attack the speaker and not the idea. What an enormous waste of time for everyone !!
As to Mr. Plimer , he is but one of many skeptics.and I have,posted his video here merely to get comments on his conclusions . Anyone who wishes to ignore me is more than welcome to do so.
In fact there was a time that I was forced to leave Stockhouse since they had revealed my identity to a third party. Guess who was one of the first posters to want me back !!
BTW science is not a popularity contest , politics is . Watch the video !!