RE:RE:RE:RE:those were the days my friends we thought they'd never endMy insight was that yours was slanted and unnecessary.
If that is your idea of a tantrum then I would say you are thin skinned and probably should avoid having kids.
Your comparison was incomplete.
Tou has done well but which stock is poised to do better from this point in time?
Do you think Tou has a 50% gain in share price in it? Does PEY?
Unless you are here to recommend this company to TOU as an acquisition,
I am not sure why you are here.
GLTA Longs
uncutgems wrote: no ideas thoughts or insights other than throwing a tantrum and wanting this to be a "safe space".
uncutgems wrote: and you just offered ZERO VALUE.
Quintessential1 wrote: Yes and you are a talker.
Why you are doing it on this board is a mystery.
Some perceived slight from years ago I suspect.
Usually a before and after comparison would include the before and after of both companies but I am guessing that that didn't make your comparrison look as good.
Anyway, thanks for wasting your time.
Please be a stranger.
GLTA Longs
uncutgems wrote: I watch companies over the LONG TERM. I cut through the Promotional BS that most retail punters Salivate over. Like SA conference calls from promotional CEOS.
I like SIMPLE CONCEPTS that are easy for retailers to grasp.
Here's one.
Before the downturn
Peyto was prodcuing about 100k boe/d.
Tourmaline was producing about 250k boe/d.
Let's look at what these companies did to change their corproate TRAJECTORY and ability to create value.
Peyto today is producting a shade over 100k boe/d. it's mix of liquids to gas has NOT CHANGED.
Tourmaline today is producing 500k/boe/d. 5x what Peyto is. It has raised it's liquids ratio to around 22% from around 15%.
there are TALKER and DOERS.
which company CEO actually creates value and which company CEO talks about it?
Which kind of CEO runs YOUR company?