RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:$100m closes NVAThough I would hold off for now to see how this plays out, I would prefer owning the combined entity than NVA or POU individually at this stage. Nuvista has a lot less overhead than Paramount, combining the 2 will almost certainly result in much lower overhead on a per boe basis. Nuvista doesn't have that much abandonment liabilities either - another positive. Finally, if they can sell an asset that has take or pay attached, they reduce debt, they reduce operating costs that are fixed in nature, and can probably replace the lost production by drilling and such to what would be (presumably) better ROI properties with their own take or pay.... At a sustainable 120K? with $1.1B? debt (after asset sale) with the quality assets it holds, Paramount becomes attractive again. Also if they can maintain 75K boepd ex Karr and ex Wapiti, you have line of sight to 150K so they become a comparable with the likes of ARC Resources and Seven Generations and should attract more funds. YMMV!