RE:RE:RE:PPRThis? Looks like QC and CAN killed some licenses. Man I would live to see Can pay some fhat anti oil and gas climate fraud. Definatlly, a crime on behalf of Can and QC.
The claimant alleges that the revocation of the river licence violates Canada’s obligations under articles 1105 (Minimum Standard of Treatment) and 1110 (Expropriation). More specifically, it alleges that the passing of the Act is an arbitrary, unfair and inequitable measure based on political and populist grounds rather than actual environmental grounds.
https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/lone.aspx?lang=eng
Justhalffull wrote: I think the share cancellation in relation to GoldmanSachs may have bought them some time. No doubt that the debt remains very high and the hedges limit their ability to pay much down. While I don't think this will ever be a $1.00 stock with the name Prairie Provident, I am betting the new CEO Berthelet can keep it going forward to some degree. My sell target is .25. One freebie which I think is getting no value whatsoever in the SP is the Lone Pine NAFTA case. Case decision was supposed to be summer of 2021, which is running out soon. I'm hoping they get something, perhaps $50,000,000 in damages. Should this happen, then who knows where PPR goes.