RE:RE:RE:US MilitarySnowdrift wrote: Thanks for replying, Carson. You're the only one who did (except for the jerk who was trying to push some other stock). I was beginning to think nobody agreed with me. It's great to know someone else shares my opinion.
Have a nice weekend!
Snowdrift
I totally agree Snowdrift...thanks for highlighting the important fact that USA Military already had PYR systems before and having repeat business is incredible as this new aircraft carrier requires new very strigent specs that PYR had to engineer. For the USA Navy/Military to design the carrier with PYR waste destruction system in the designs is nothing short of incredible. This is a huge feather in PYR's cap bc industries across the board know how impossible it is to pass the highest level of parameters to get approved onto a USA Aircraft Carrier!!!!!
Btw I actually just clicked thumbs up without commenting but I wished could click a bigger thumbs up as I really enjoyed your post....and sadly other toxic posters or non-informative posts pushes down good intel.
VERY exciting times!!!
All the best :)