RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:LKAB/SSAB PYR... if this is true I guess another way of looking at it with what little info is out there is that perhaps LKAB is only using bio oils (40% ghg reduction) in the meantime for the HYBRIT pilot plant while they work out making the eventual transition to 100% ghg reducing plasma torches, because plasma pelletization is definitely heavily linked to LKAB through extensive Swedish research papers and other news sources.
Pitpitcolisse wrote: That's the beauty of investing in Pyro, we know they can provide a 100% reduction in GHG with this process. How and why it wouldn't become the new norm is beyond me. All 3 clients want to have first mover advantage, they keep it hidden to the market but I believe they are as excited as we are... poker face kept until it's time to reveal the cards.
Downtheline wrote: Of course, of course. NRs mentioned bio oils provide a 40% GHG reduction which is less than what pyro is advertising. I would just like to know if pyro will indeed be part of the HYBRIT pilot opening Aug 31, and if not, can we expect bio oil to be a legitimate competing technology for iron ore pelletization (70 billion $ industry enough to go around for everyone). I guess we'll find out Monday!