RE:RE:RE:Mcwhirter does NOT change the story....PYR is still on trackIf you care to read my posts you would have been forwarned that
Mcwhirter
is totally oblivious to the technology fields because he has no radar, except for traditionnal earnings and dividends and if his algorithm does not see those words, his comments will not be positive or even very negative. I wrote about him about 1 month ago and was called a shorty or basher by you know who. He is insane(
Mcwhirter). His eyes go blank too often when asked a technical question. He does not understand technology development. Mind you, if he is fed by some of the brilliant DD found on this BB, there is a HUGE credibility GAP. Repetition is not a solution to corporate growth.
The Pumping Quatuor just keep copying each other's messages ad nauseam. In doing so they set the scene for high expectation and a cliff jump. Bravo Developbc you are the Shorts' best friend.
You should be prohibited from repeating undated and horrible promises.
The bullying style is unbecoming to the Board.
Bottom line results are what make the needle move. And we know that imminent does not mean immediately. Big contracts are not short order cook orders. Now we know what developbc eats... junkfood for immediate satisfaction. No expiration date. Junk is junk.
dcowan wrote: That won't move the needle. It's the equivalent of a school yard pissing match.
We need a contract (or three), plain and simple.
M139 wrote: It might not change the story, but it has quite obviously changed the price, and not for the better. IMO Peter should adress the blatantly incorrect report from McWitrter, and McWhirter should be obligated to retract his statements or at the very least, provide a proper update. If he is going to comment on any company, he should do so with up to date and correct information, and not be seen as trying to manipulate the stock downwards so he can load up again after supposedly selling off at a huge profit.
mc