RE:RE:RE:McWhirterNo, he gave out false and misleading information based on his lack of due diligence. Its that simple. Luckily we have the best ceo who came out shortly after to let everyone know he doesn't know what he's talking about.
hemi3tc wrote: U people hard on Rob probably did not view the BNN segment.
His view is conservative based on his knowledge of the industry. Company A is going to buy 1 or 2 torches to rest trial for about 6 months and analyse the performance.
Company will make a decision by next summer to maybe buy 10 more torches.
Rob says maybe the company surprises him and goes all in.
kjs4381 wrote: kjs4381 wrote: This guy was too much. He could care less what he said since he sold his position. He lost all credibility, he thinks a huge company that needs to solve their GHG and emissions problem is going to go slowly and purchase 1 or 2 torches, makes no sense. They have 10 plants with a need for 50 torches in each. I could see possibly purchasing 50 ( changing a complete plant) and depending on the success, changing the other plants. The savings in fines and environmental charges are too big for them to move slowly on this. Just look at company C, they wanted to skip the modeling and go straight to purchasing. How could he sound so stupid? Jmo
I don't begrudge anyone from making money in the the stock market, it's your money. But in this case he got cold feet and didn't have the nerve to see it through to it's potential. Even that would have been ok if he had given a truthful answer the caller, instead of telling a false story. Jmo