RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Torch contracts...What a tool gijotv. Another imbecile. Current valuations are based on future projected earnings which are much higher than current year numbers. If you took the time to look at prior posts you will see many projections posted by various individuals. They are projections which could be valid. Only time will tell. Go take your bashing elsewhere.
gojotv! wrote: Peter himself has estimated EPS for the year's end at $0.11.
At 20 multiple, that's a share price of $2.20.
It takes earnings of 17M to achieve that with our 154M share float.
Can anyone justify our current double on that price?
Do it. And please show your work. Pie-in-the-sky doesn't do it for me.
GLTA real investors! Welderkev1 wrote: Lol please provide the DD that you did to raise the question why are people excited about this supposedly overvalued stock. Please enlighten us with the information we missed in our DD that suggests this is a bad investment that's only going to plummet.
gojotv! wrote: Au contraire, pumpers...
A wise shareholder has to ask why the board exhibits massive daily pumping by so many new arrivals while the price keeps dropping.
And then, noting that deadlines have been missed is completely legitimate.
What does it mean?
Only pumpers who are organized to flood the board and bilk true investors into buying overvalued shares could possibly feel threatened by legitimate questioning.
That's what really arouses suspicion.
GLTA true investors.
sandysouci wrote: Jchoo: don't you see that Gojotv is just screwing with you and others on this board???...
go back and check his (her?) previous posts... they are all the same, and he is working hard to create worry and
get you to sell, and/or try to drop the price of PYR... plus just likes to get attention and a rise out of others... do not take the bait...
he is best put on ignore, if you know what's good for you... not just imho...
jchoo04023 wrote: Hello Gojotv,
I am pretty sure it was never claimed that the contracts would be in by the end of August, that was just the supposed time the modeling contract for Client A was supposed to be finished. In addition, Peter recently commented that they were looking to close a torch contract sometime around the end of Q3 which still puts us within a reasonable timeframe. Also, why is it implied that it is only the clients that are pushing for better prices or better conditions, why can it not be Pyrogenesis that is pushing for higher prices and better conditions? For a supposed shareholder of Pyr, I sense a lot of doubt and suspicion emanating from your post....seems odd.
Regards,
Jchoo