RE:CommunicationMaybe the client gets a 10 for 1 now in terms of leasing the torch compare to buy them. So for the same amount of money, recurring each year, client have 10 torch leased instead of 1 bought. Maybe its 5 for 1, I dont know. After 5 or 10 years, PYR is in big profit with those reccuring leasing revenu GLTA
canyousayiii wrote: I would summarize that there is a communication issue. Peter is talking terms that many of us are not properly interpreting. For example, I don't know how you can have a draft contract in place in September that you are trying to finalize but then shift from sales to lease. That change in the business proposition is huge in terms of contract terms so I don't see how it could result in a tweaking of what has been drafted. In my view, the "contract" in September was not as advanced as some of us may have interpreted it and the business structure was still being negotiated. Now we have to wait to see what the actual deal will be, and yet again, we have the "hell of a lot more money" that was tossed out there. Make sure your starting point is not Uncleron's for interpreting what this means!