RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Should have listened to PteRoy i laugh at this comment as I read it! You claimed pumpers and shorters made the fall of pyr! What I was agreeing with is the run that was happening!!! Not the people!!! Pumpers and shorters can have both the same negative impact but as long as they sell high it don't matter! So I don't give a ratass about them as much as you! I was talking about the run that happened!!! I repeated myself twice so you can clearly know my English comprehensions!!!
canyousayiii wrote: Isn't it you that said "same thing happened with PYR after it's run"? Hmmm, yup, looking down at the thread, that WAS you. I don't speak English well, but that sounds like a comparison to me. I could elaborate on my comment because there are things you can make similar comparisons and comparisons that are drastically different (most) . I could do that so much better than you, but that would be a waste of my time since YOU compared GME and PYR and then jump on that comparison when I comment on it. I understand you are hurt by the "baseless comments" thing, but sorry to say those comments were baseless. You portrayed yourself as knowing that Client A was sold the torch for cheap based on the economic numbers, yet CLEARLY Peter stated that the demo is necessary and useful for both parties to FIGURE out these things, as we all know is the case when you have yet to install a new technology in a real live operating environment. But you seem to know better than Peter and the client. How should we interpret that besides potentially seeing you as someone who can see into the future?
dougkimbrough wrote: CANYOUSAYKISSMYA$$...Do not compare PYR with GME. PYR is going up because we have game changing tech in play. GME is going SOMEWHERE because of the stick it to the man attitude. You saId I have baseless comments but yet I see a retarded comment from you(canyousay)....... PYR is under valued IMO and GME is honestly shht. GME HAS ALREADY STUCK IT TO THE MAN so it's been time to leave.
canyousayiii wrote: Yes, that's exactly my point. Shorters can screw you just like pumpers can screw you.
RealistDontalkm wrote: same thing happened with PYR after it's run.
canyousayiii wrote: You cannot honestly say that those that bought at $200, $300, $400 for the cause should not worry about the SP being under $100 today. It is pretty simple. Manipulation was organized to fight manipulation. Manipulators made money and those that were sucked into the ride may have gotten lucky and made money, or may have gotten unlucky and got burnt. If those that got burnt recover, there will be those that got lucky and made even more. What went on here was just games on many sides and to profit, a lot of people needed to get burnt one way or another. Don't feel bad for the gamers, feel bad for the folk using their hard earned bucks and getting burnt by the storytellers.
PteRoy wrote: You should go do some research about what is actually happening ;) Its a complicated situation so I dont expect a lot of retial investors if any to understand what is actually going on. But I feel great. In fact I bought even more!!
damnyourugly wrote: I really wish I had taken PteRoy's advice last week and sold all my pyr shares to buy GameStop shares for $300 a piece.