Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pyrogenesis Canada Inc T.PYR

Alternate Symbol(s):  PYRGF

PyroGenesis Canada Inc. is a Canada-based high-tech company. It is engaged in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases. It offers patented and advanced plasma technologies that are used in four markets: iron ore palletization, aluminum, waste management, and additive manufacturing. Its products and services include Plasma Atomized Metal Powders, Aluminum and Zinc Dross Recovery (DROSRITE), waste management, plasma torches, and Innovation/Custom Process Development. It also operates PUREVAP NSiR, which is a proprietary process that can use different purities of silicon as feedstock to make a range of spherical silicon nano- and micro-powders and wires, for use across various applications. Its products and services are commercialized to customers operating in a range of industries, including the defense, metallurgical, mining, advanced materials, oil & gas, and environmental industries.


TSX:PYR - Post by User

Comment by Casavantsghoston Oct 09, 2022 3:06pm
100 Views
Post# 35014988

RE:RE:RE:PFAS Contract $9.2 Million

RE:RE:RE:PFAS Contract $9.2 Million

It would appear that obfuscation has been a large part of the word-smithing Ali g with the client shall remain unnamed for competitive reason. That has become a joke. 


sorrenson wrote: There was never a contract signed and I would think  this should never have been booked under any standard accounting system

From what I can tell last year woods environmental was looking at various destruction technologies and plasma gasification was one of them and they reached some form of agreement that should they get funding from the federal government then the may proceed with the plasma destruction facility

You will note that PYR as usual carefully worded their press release to say awarded not has signed a contract this is the same as the magnesium announcements they are not final contracts or even firm pricing or requirements.

Fom woods March 2022 presentation to wausau MN. So yes there was discussions maybe letters of intent but absolutely was not signed contracts and you will recall twice Peter skated and stated they were not signed contracts .


"We are also awaiting additional DOD related research funding on PFAS background in multimedia, foam fractionation, and onsite destruction of PFAS waste via a novel Gasification technology that produces a beneficial gas for reuse"


as with all pyrogenesis press releases dissect and take them with a 50 pound bag of salt  

 

Gordinno wrote:
BIGMOE wrote: First issue is the PFAS Contract of $9.2 Million

1.  Pyro won the contract in a fair bid and were selected.

2.  Pyro technology works based on US Navy and UN contract.  IP is developed and protected.

3. Now the question they bid for this projet, I assume in Pyro bidding process that their IP protected and they must have clauses in the bid and contract document.  The Town of Easton (who ever, we are guessing) and WES Construction Corp (we are guessing), they all must have known before they selected Pyro that their IP non transferrable.  This all should have been taken care off when Pyro was issued the contract based on my limited legal d ocument signing.

4.My queston is who did Pyro sign the contract with?  Town of Easton or the WES Construciton Corp?  Can somebody clarify this?  I think Pyro need to clarify?

5.  To me it's kind of strange that last minutes or months before the project in manufacturing process, we are discussing who owns the IP.  I think the Town or the Generact Contractor should know this that no company in the world going to give their secret sauce for just a project.

6.  All above for discussion purpose only and no need to get upset or calling name to anybody or disrespect any organization.  it should be constructive discussion on all sides.



 


Was there ever a contract




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>