RE:Here we go again… I would not say ''straight down'' , as in your reference , but lower ? , maybe yes. Keep in mind, after the explosive growth from the sell/cross sell of the Elm aquisition starts to mature ,(which is still months away),its back to other segments not making money dragging down the whole package. At that time, the 8% rate of the debt will become a burden. It actually is already . Either sell off non-growth sections of the company, get smaller and more profitable by way of unloading non growth sections ,or purchase more tuck-ins in areas where those current footprints are already there. --Actually ,the wording should be changed: not ''tuck-ins'', but '' take overs'' . I'll wait on this one until the ''low 6's '', and re-aquire my 1000 shares . If a tuck-in is announced,in the right location I'll buy right there at that time . There is room for one or two purchases in the 5-7 mil range, from cash on hand ,while leaving enough for continued operations . IMO