RE: RE: RE: RE: WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA I am glad everyone is confident about that. But I am not so confident, perhaps because I am starting to feel shell shocked with Wilan. You know, like the feeling of "omg, what next". We were so naively confident about LG, but look what happened there. Now we are so hung up on the positive claim construction that we might be ignoring some of the potential risks - including the potential that Wilan might have got it wrong on the applicability if its patents or that the lawyers will mess up again. The argument put forward by the defendants on Dec 14 seems to point to substantial prior art that would be applicable with the broader interpretation of the claim construction put forward by wilan. Is there any merit to this? I have no clue. I just hope wilan doesn't mess up again.