RE:RE:RE:Argument for reinstating original verdict Now we know why extension to feb 12 2012 requested.
Extremely powerful cross-appeal .
Case 20- 2011 Of Federal Court states " Document 23 of 94 filed 01/12/2021
Appears 94 page cross -appeal which appears to prove judge made numerous errors of document admissability ( too numerous to list by me) . Decision appears greatly flawed.
Of particular interest is the fact that on most recent Virnetx victory for 524 million by Apple, there was a licensing fee of .84 cents . Nov2020.
The presence top Us attorney lawyer Jeffrey Lamken (Previously Assistant Attorney General in Washington and part of successful Vernetx team has added enormously to appeal that Judge made numerous errors in law.
It is my view legal team in are no mood to settle with APPLE.