Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

RMP ENERGY INC T.RMP

"Iron Bridge Resources Inc, formerly RMP Energy Inc is a crude oil and natural gas company engaged in the exploration for, development and production of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids in Western Canada."


TSX:RMP - Post by User

Post by ditchdigger251on Mar 06, 2017 10:09pm
300 Views
Post# 25941478

Paramount's Feb Operational Update

Paramount's Feb Operational UpdateHere's some detailed recent Paramount data taken from wells that are approximately 2 townships south and 1.5 townships west of RMP's Gold Creek lands:

https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/paramount-resources-ltd-provides-operational-update-and-preliminary-2017-outlook-613813823.html

I want to point out that these wells are drilled with ~3000m lateral lengths and were slick water frac'd at 100 tonne/stage and stage spacing of 40m to 59m (the 15-14 well had the biggest spacing).  Paramount was really going Full Out Texas to stimulate as much rock as possible.  The proppant intensity is over twice as much as what many operators were doing just over a year ago (I've seen many completions between 0.8 to 1.2 tonnes/m of lateral).  The results from such "Full Montney" all-in horizontals are astonishing.  Keep in mind that Paramount's land is further "down dip" and more in the "overpressure" area compared to RMP's lands that appear to fall in a more normally pressured area - that can affect that type of completion that works the best (for example Advantage Oil & Gas used N2-foam fracs on more normally pressured Upper Montney & energized slick water fracs on overpressured lower-middle Montney wells).  The bottomline is I can see RMP's land as being more oily than Paramounts - which still is pretty darn good given that 40% of the BOE's produced are liquids.

 

15-02 PAD

4-19 PAD

WELLS

15-14

4-7

02/4-7

1-12

02/1-12

Completion Details

         
 

Completion Stages

50

70

75

73

58

 

Proppant (tonnes)

5,000

7,000

7,500

7,300

5,800

 

Proppant intensity (tonnes / meter)

1.7

2.3

2.5

2.4

1.9

Production - Cumulative

         
 

Natural gas(1) (MMcf)

997

135

45

9

25

 

Wellhead liquids(1) (Bbl)

161,479

64,318

30,338

3,365

6,484

 

CGR(2) (Bbl/MMcf)

162

477

675

380

258

 

Days of flowback

152

45

16

11

13

Production - Last 7 Producing Days

         
 

Natural gas(1) (MMcf/d)

5.0

4.8

3.7

   
 

Wellhead liquids(1) (Bbl/d)

754

1,915

2,261

n/a(3)

n/a(4)

 

CGR(2) (Bbl/MMcf)

152

403

607

   

Production - Last 24 Producing Hours

         
 

Natural gas(1) (MMcf/d)

5.4

4.7

3.4

4.1

 
 

Wellhead liquids(1) (Bbl/d)

832

1,766

1,824

1,945

n/a(4)

 

CGR(2) (Bbl/MMcf)

153

380

536

474

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>