RE:RE:RE:Time for an Update from ManagementSurvey Hi G1945V and Jkj and others.
I don't know the % required nor about how to amend the constitution to have shareholder lists distributed. I'm pretty sure this would not happen because it violates confidentialty.
Here is my current thinking. One of Sanfran's posts got me thinking about it. Us posters share our ideas on various topics and sometimes there are positive comments, we all seem hopeful and yet we are extremely frustrated by many things such as lack to communications, lack of identifable progress and lack of fairness regarding insiders. However, we have never quantified this...that is, we have never added up our collective opinions.
If we did a survey on people that post on this site and people that read our posts we could quantitatively add up our opinions and provide that information to RVX. For example questions like the following could be asked;
- How satisfied are you with the management of RVX? not at all........extremely satisfied
- How satisfied are you with the competence of RVX management? not at all........extremely
- How satisfacted are you with the communication provided by RVX? not at all........extremely satisfied
- How satisfied are you with the fairness of how retail investors are treated? not at all........extremely satisfied
- How satisfied are you with the rate of progress being achieved by RVX? not at all........extremely satisfied
- To what degree do you trust RVX management? not at all......somewhat......totally
- Do you believe that a phase2iii trial will be funded? yes...no...don't know
- Do you believe in the underlying science that rvx-208 is based on?yes...no...don't know
- What is your preferred form of financing for the next trial? CVR, float new shares, etc
- etc, etc
The questions would need to be decided by the posters on this forum.
The responses would be tallied and provided back to this site and to RVX after we discuss the the results on this forum.
There could be a separate anonymous survey where each of us input the number of RVX shares we hold. Then each person that responded could indicate on this site that they responded to the survey. That way we would have a very rough idea of the
minimum number of shares held by retail investors and probably some insiders.
This would give a
very crude tally of where we stand. There are lots of problems with the approach as follows;
- It is not scientific because it is not based on a random sample.
- It is self selecting.
- Anybody can respond including plants from RVX. This can be partly controlled because we would ask for names and/or aliases.
- It clearly would not get close to representing all retail shareholders.
If there is interest let me know and I
may pursue it further. It will cost me time and money so I don't know if I'll do it.
Keep in mind that if the data comes back very negative it would not be good to post it OR we could have something like 100% believe in the science of rvx-208 and that ph2c will proceed but most people are unhappy with communication and management.
AND at the end of the day it won't change anything other than perhaps change the RVX approach to communications.
SO now that I have written this I'm starting to think it is not a good idea!!! Go figure!
Just thinkng out loud again.
Cheers
Toinv