"We’re filing almost immediately within the next week or so for this program to commence. Patient enrollment should start as early as March. Maybe it will slip into April, but we will have patients enrolled in this very soon."
"Almost immediately" CLEARLY doesn't mean 1 week "or so".
"Almost immediately" doesn't even mean 2 weeks.
and guess what?! "Almost immediately" also doesn't mean 3 weeks!
will it mean within 4 weeks? stay tuned, another daily 5% drop coming soon to a theatre near you!
wonder what they mean by "very soon"?! : "but we will have patients enrolled in this very soon." is that 2022-soon?
if "Almost immediately" doesn't actually mean immediately, does April actually mean April? Does March = March? Guess we'll have to guess. thats what the english language is for DM! words mean what they mean! If onyl there was some sort of refernce guide, u know, where i can look up what "immedaitely" means!? Im gonna invent something, its gonna make me RICH! You look words up in the dik-shun-ary, and it says what the word actually means! The Oxford English Dik-shun-ary has this to say about IMMEDIATELY:
1- At once; instantly.‘I called immediately for an ambulance
2- Without any intervening time or space. ‘she was sitting immediately behind me’
efffff me, i hope i dont ever have a need for someone at RVX to immediately call for an ambulance, for me or anyone else for that matter, even u DM!! "At once". "Without any intervening time" (is 3+ weeks considered intervening time?!!?)
so, these words you keep saying, i do not think they mean what you think they mean!
our news releases miight as well say "Banana soccer tire moonlight seaweed!" Translation:: the Covid trial will start by Friday with the filing of the paperwork. See how easy it is to communicate intent and purpose and concrete details to the public? You just choose random words and let people interpret what the words actually mean. why rely on thousands of year's of defined, structured engligh language and words, lets make it up and change the meaning to everything!
my interests are no different than the "Big Insiders". ALL of our interests are the same. i just DESPISE being misled or duped AGAIN and that's all management seems to do. Is NOBODY going to challenge the drivel coming out of HQ? You're all ok with it?!?! am i that cray-cray? ALL of the other companies i invest in, you can listen to the CEO and they actually do what they say thyre gonna do. All this talk about retail being different than "big insiders", i just dont see it that way! u mean to say u think retail wants this to only go to say 5$, while the insiders want what, 30$ GET REAL! we all want the same thing: ka-freakin-ching, do-re-mi.....$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. The only difference i see is that the insiders might not be hawking their $ as closely as i am cause i'm sick and tired of all the drivel spweing from the uncapped well that is DM's pie-hole... it'd be a different story had there been ANY execution in the DECADE-PLUS we've been here!
wonder if we're being sunk by the saudi money not appearing by now....the US of A is putting those fine people in their place, starting with the chief murderer. maybe that's derailing us? looks like its just a bluff at this point, hasnt materialized YET.... or maybe we're going to go back to the well to double dip and ask the saudis to fund the entire BOM v2. 60M was enuf to fund BOMv1 wasn't it, DM? Remember that one!? "we're fully funded to complete BoM".!!!! how'd that work out?? and you have the gall to say you've kept dilution to a minimum...
so we'll only need <60M cause it looks like we're gonna repeat the same mistakes, have the same # of ppl in BoM2 as BoM1. wonderful! ask a pro for their opionion, cr@p all over it, reject the sound BP advice and go it alone....it took a full year to come up with that trial design? same numbers, mostly the same endpoints? i think i could design this on a napkin over beers!
"We don't have the horsepower to go it alone...."
"By the end of the year" (Not the end of this year, last year, as in 2+months ago)
the foam around my mouth needs wiping now... while a brutal overall day on wall st, it's ok, cause most of the stocks i have were up 40,50 60+ % in only a few short months...so it doesnt hurt too much giving back house money. wish i could say the same thing here, but there is no house money to lose, only mine....
and no, i dont see this as $hyting all over my investment. i certainly hope IR is reading these posts cause they have nothing else to do! maybe the message will be watered down by the time it reaches the elite in the ivory tower, if it even does.... you cant fault the people receiving the message, loud and clear. find fault with the empty-message-over-paid-non-executing-shady executives who are running the show. you have a responsibility to all shareholders equally, even the little guys!
what good is this great science if its being run into the ground by inept, misleading fools? i'm going to go back now and re-read the news release where we came to the sudden realization that we RVX-208 was actually a BET inhibitor! YEARs after our first trials, oh looky-looky, i think this might be a BET inhibitor! They stumbled into this! im not cool with letting them stumble forward any longer. get the efff out of the way to let someone bring this home...
and thats how i get myself banned from agora...kool-aid drinkers dont wanna hear it. its all love and basketball isnt it?