RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:ANOTHER DROP IN NICKEL PRICES...MAY-DAY MAY-DAY MAY-DAYrkhosla / all... just 2 questions (that were probably discussed and answered long before I showed up here) as to why S did not perform better in the past when Ni was higher as well as currently:
1) Revenue- how much more rev would S have made if their production hit target/did not slip, and they were then able to sell the same higher % of their production as in the past (when demand was a bit stronger)
2) Costs- really dig into their entire cost/purchasing structure... starting with, are the higher prices that S has paid/is paying for their inputs in line with other miners operating in unique jurisdictions where costs are typically naturally higher- in this case an island)?
Btw I phrased the above as questions but please note I am not expecting anyone to put themselves through any more agony over this stock than some of you have already gone through and answer. I feel I am staring at "a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma." (W.Churchill)