Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Surge Energy Inc (Alberta) T.SGY

Alternate Symbol(s):  ZPTAF | T.SGY.DB.B

Surge Energy Inc. is a Canada-based oil focused exploration and production company. The Company’s business consists of the exploration, development and production of oil and gas from properties in western Canada. Its operations include Sparky and SE Saskatchewan. Its supporting assets include Valhalla, Greater Sawn and Shaunavon. The Sparky operation offers light/medium crude oil production with compelling returns. The SE Saskatchewan operation maintains asset base oil operating netbacks. It has low-cost wells with short payouts and potential for continued area consolidation. The Valhalla operation is offering stacked pay multi-zone potential with light oil and provides range of area infrastructure and access to multiple egress options supports attractive operating netbacks. The Shaunavon operation is producing low decline, medium gravity crude oil with high operating netbacks. Its Greater Swan operation consists of concentrated light oil asset with conventional slave point reefs.


TSX:SGY - Post by User

Comment by sclardaon Nov 17, 2021 2:11am
141 Views
Post# 34134858

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Re: Debt

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Re: DebtKontrary wrote

You're quite bitter, aren't you? It seems you believe that people should only comment here if they're going to pump up a stock. I'm not actually "spouting" numbers, I'm analyzing the current situation. Your point that things would look better if it rose to $70-80 a few years ago is irrelevant, not only because it didn't happen but also because the company was actually doing better for shareholders back when Oil was trading at $55 than it plans to next year even if Oil stays at $80.

That's the point you seem to keep missing. Management has actually actively made things worse in a very tangible way. On a per-share basis, cash-flow was higher from 2017 to 2019 than it is today and will be next year. Even though Oil prices were much lower in those years.

As for your condescending little lesson on how companies work, part of the problem for us retail investors is that there are no large institutional investors interested in Surge, which means there is no investor large enough to get management's attention. Only 30% of shareholders voted on the Astra acquisition and share consolidation (I voted against both).

So while I'm pulling on "my big-boy pants", tell me this: This management team just reduced your holdings by 50%. You now earn less on each of your shares than you were 3-4 years ago and will still earn less next year, even if prices stay high. The share prices of most of Surge's competitors have increased by several multiples (CJ is up 10X in the past year) who will be selling at the same prices as Surge. Surge is barely above its 2020 lows.

You're obviously unhappy with me, but why aren't you unhappy with Surge's management?

sclarda wrote:

            It is very easy to be a Monday morning quarterback. The numbers you spout would have looked a lot better if oil had risen to $70 to $80 or more a few years ago. Surge would be sitting pretty with no debt and  a very large cashflow and big dividend.  If that would have happened people like you would be crowing about all the money you made with Surge and what a great investor you are.

And now that things didnt work out because oil prices never rose until now you put all the blame on Surge management.     Did anyone force you to buy shares years ago?  Time to put on your big boy pants and accept responsibility for your own actions and mistakes. 


The way it works  is a companies management CEO and board of directors decide the companies strategy and if and when to make acquisitions etc. If enough shareholders dont like the direction the company is taking they can get rid of management and hire new people. Since that doesnt seem to be happening with Surge the present management will follow the strategy that they are following no matter how many posts people like you make on Stockhouse.

If you dont like it you can sell your shares anytime and go away.  

I wont miss you.
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  "You're quite bitter arent you."

  Says the guy who spends everyday here foaming at the mouth endlessly repeating the same tired old b.s. over and over.

"It seems that you believe that people should only comment here if they are going to pump up a stock."

I am not pumping this stock. The reason that Surge has a very low shareprice that you cant seem to understand  is because it was a 15 000 barrel per day high decline   producer with $292 million in debt and a lot of bad hedges for this year not to mention a very poor performer over the last many years.  That is why the Surge shareprice is low. You bought a dog of an oil company and have held on to it for many years. Congratulations. 

"The company was actually doing better for shareholders back when oil was trading at $55 than it plans to next year even if oil stays at $80."

Well then lets all pray for oil to get back to $55 next year then Surge will make a pile more money than they would at $80.


"On a per share basis cashflow was actually higher from 2017 to 2019 than it is today and will be next year."

This is the cause of your problems. Although you spout a lot of numbers you cant seem to read a  simple financial statement. Cashflow alone means very little. It is Free cashflow after Capex that is important.  

In 2017 Surge had Cashflow of aprox. $104 million and Capex of aprox. $98 million. They had Free cashflow of aprox. $6 million.  Divide the 6 million by the 27 million shares and Surge had Free cashflow per share of aprox.  23 cents per share in 2017.

In 2018 Surge had Cashflow or aprox. $122 million and Capex of $120 million. Divide the $2 million in Free cashflow remaining by the 27 million shares and in 2018 Surge had Free cashflow per share of aprox.  8 cents.

In 2019 Surge had Cashflow or aprox. $149 million and Capex of $120 million leaving aprox. $29 million in Free cashflow  Divide that by the 38 million shares from that year and in 2019 Surge had Free cashflow of aprox.  75 cents per share in 2019.

In 2022 if oil stays around $80 Surge is forecasting aprox. $280 million of cashflow and $120 million in Capex leaving  $160 million in FREE Cashflow. Divide the $160 million by aprox. 83 million shares outstanding and next year Surge will have FREE Cashflow of aprox.  $1.90 per share vs. the $1.06 per share they had in total from the three years from 2017 to 2019.

In other words Surge next year at $80 oil will have Free Cashflow  $160 million.

In the three years from 2017 to 2019 they had aprox.  Free Cashflow of $37 million.

So next year Surge will have over 4 times the Free Cashflow that they had in the three years from 2017 to 2019.   

In those 3 years that you remember so fondly Surge burned up aprox.  20 million barrels of oil resources and produced $37 millon in Free cashflow which would not be enough to replace a fraction of the resources burned up. 

 And you keep wondering why the shareprice is so low?

You keep dreaming about those good old days.

"This management team just reduced your holdings by 50%. You now earn less on each of your shares than you were 3-4 years ago and will still earn less next year even if prices stay high."

Wrong on all counts. As i explained above  if oil stays at $80 next year Surge will have more than 4 times the free cashflow it had from 2017 to 2019.

And i am not "earning" anything more or less  on my Surge shares than i was 3 or 4 years ago because i never held any shares of this bloated pig  3 or 4 years ago and i am still not holding any now. 



I am waiting until tax loss season  to load up at rock bottom shareprices when people like you who cant add very well and  are extremely bitter and like to live in the past and  who bought  lots of shares at much higher prices and held on through all those glory years of  zero Free cashflow will be selling to people like me who can add and read a basic financial statement.

And next year i will ride your shares back up to double what you payed for them and then sell them back to you at the top.



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>