Post by
downtozero on Mar 13, 2024 7:57pm
Debt reduction and conf call BS
I wish they were more open and honest when talking finances. At the conf call, someone brought up the question of whether they were counting on the warrants to meet their debt reduction numbers and they answered with a "NO". It's easy to see if they only make $130M FCF per year and they plan on paying off $460M by Q2 26, they either need the warrant money or they'll need to do another significant bought deal. Saying they don't need the warrants to make their debt targets is BS.
They had a good quarter and great year, no need for this BS.
Comment by
geezer21 on Mar 18, 2024 8:50pm
There is good debt if it is earning more than what it costs. If there is a place to put the banks money to work at a profit over the term rate you likely should keep that debt, however, if you have no other place to deploy free cash flow than it can be prudent to pay the debt down and have that free cash flow earning what it saves in debt servicing costs.
Comment by
Kpitreal on Mar 20, 2024 12:44pm
NAV vaalue of the assets is around $16.00. Company is out of favour because of the debt levels as you said. With the debt coming down the share value will go up. Analysts avg tagert is $5.25 for 1 yr out. $5.00 to $10.00 in 2 years and $15.00 in 3 ? possible imo
Comment by
Rainyday on Mar 22, 2024 4:00pm
Solid accumulation is taking place - for the reasons you said.