Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Slate Office REIT 9 00 Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures Exp 28 Feb 2026 T.SOT.DB

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.SOT.DB.A | T.SOT.DB.B | T.SOT.UN | SLTTF



TSX:SOT.DB - Post by User

Comment by CanSiamCypon Oct 28, 2022 1:40pm
102 Views
Post# 35056368

RE:Net Asset Value

RE:Net Asset ValueHi Hawk!

I note that TD moved their target price for SOT.un downwards to $4.75 per unit (and National Bank moved their TP down to $4.40). Any idea why they would be revising downwards???

Cheers!

hawk35 wrote:
I'm not sure where National Bank and Royal Bank got their NAV numbers.

NAV calculation is very simple.  Here it is:

Total Assets - Total Liabilities divided by Shares Outstanding.

Based on the Q2 balance sheet:

1,989219,000 - 1,275,423,000 = 713,796,000 divided by 80,174,000 = $8.90.

NAV is not a good indicator of value.  The reason is that all properties on the balance sheet are valued at what they originally paid for them minus depreciation.  NAV does not reflect what the properties are worth today.  If you factored in what the properties are worth today  the NAV value would be higher.  How much higher depends on how long ago the properties were purchased.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>