Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd T.SUE.WT



TSX:SUE.WT - Post by User

Post by Bdiddyon Jun 02, 2008 7:52pm
413 Views
Post# 15136860

CMM'S News Release

CMM'S News Release

Does anyone think the difference in the wording of the comments about the 2 write offs means anything?  ie they said...."Century has recorded a write-off of its investment in Rosario de Belen in the Company's 2007 year-end financial statements, and anticipates recognizing no further liabilities related to this transaction."   On the other transaction they say ..."As with the Rosario de Belen transaction, Century has written off the deposits paid toward the purchase of Algamarca and the expenses related to the takeover bid for Sulliden Exploration Inc. in the Company's 2007 year-end financial statements, and currently recognizes no further liabilities related to these transactions"   

They are not the same.  Is this difference significant??   Is it just litigation costs that they are afraid of or do they have more costly concerns??  Does it even matter as they seem to be in a death spiral??

bdiddy

Bullboard Posts