RE:No Downside Risk What I find fascinating is the sense that the company’s response is a reaction to something recent in nature, rather than something that has been brewing for 5 years. The fact that shareholders have been questioning the motivations of Ray Matthews and the capacity limits of Phillip is not the exclusive concern of what is now a group defined as dissident. Whoever decided that the problem shareholders have is limited to a few high share count holders…is the problem. Treating all shareholders as somehow incapable of understanding the big picture here is pretty insulting. We may not be aware of every detail, but we do see how long this is taking because of the many missteps (won’t list them all here). If ever the company had put a list together that admitted the mistakes and then shown how, and by when, each of those problems would be resolved…there would be no dissidents. You keep Ray Matthews around instead of resolve the problem. You say we’ll put Phillip in the right seat, and then don’t. All the pandering in the world is not a proxy for being accountable for an agenda that does not align with shareholder wishes. The shareholders did not start this. The dissidents are simply the product of insult after insult. I hope that Spain acts as a place of reflection over reaction.
DF