RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:THTX Big buy todayI agree, qwerty. The new guy always can do everything better than the old and of course it sounds great now. It is much like early dating, everything right now is optimistic and rosy.The new guy has all the answers and is so wonderful. Hard for me to believe he will make that much difference. I sure hope so. Regardless I am much more optimistic about the NASH prospects/possibilities than the existing business. But if we can get the existing business turned up a notch or two then all the better since it has been so disappointing.
I hope Palinc is right about our new CEO!
qwerty22 wrote: "..I seem to be the only one on this Board that sees the new Ceo as someone who will execute at least twice as much as the former Ceo"
the turnaround in your outlook is clear to see :)
I think it depends on whether there are inherent headwinds in the clinics that will just stop doctors from changing their position wrt Trogarzos role in the mdr market. The drug is efficacious, little doubt there. Some patients are being maintained in virological states that are less than gold-standard. But there are arguments for this situation to continue and it would seem to have worked its way, unofficially, into clinical practise. It seems to me they already identified the problems awhile back. Can this guy really execute in such a different way? Was Luc really that bad? I'm sceptical until I see some evidence.