RE:RE:Therapeutic window''... they must have something they are holding onto for hope. That suggests some efficacy has been seen which might be repeatable with a less toxic outcome or vice versa..''.
More of the same.
If they really have seen any efficacy they could argue the pause is to adapt their plan or something like that. In their statement they cleaarly stated that continuing that path is not worth it. All the bla bla around the reason of the pause is meaningless. They just can't say the program is a failure. Otherwise, the SP would collapse. They try the pause term instead. At one point they will declare the oncology program is stopped because......FDA did not validate their approach !!!