Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tuscany International Drilling Inc T.TID

TSX:TID - Post Discussion

Tuscany International Drilling Inc > Iaminvestor's point is very obvious.....
View:
Post by dbeaude on Oct 30, 2012 11:50pm

Iaminvestor's point is very obvious.....

Baker Hughes has done a good job diversifying their revenues and margins through an international model. International performance up.....North American performance down. So...as mentioned the moral to that story is diversify.....large North American players need to expand internationally and Tuscany is a perfect fit for most of these companies to purchase. 41 rigs with an average age of less then 5, in South America and Africa. Hello!

I am sure Walter Dawson would discourage a sale of the company at these desperate share price levels. Management  would like to get its credit house in order and then look out. However because of what I just mentioned, they may be receiving offers as we speak!

Comment by dbeaude on Oct 31, 2012 12:00am
Meant to say Shlumberger not Baker Hughs
Comment by rapid_fire_ on Oct 31, 2012 10:45am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by cetriolo on Oct 31, 2012 11:09am
i think they own less than 40%... i believe it is around 30%
Comment by totid on Oct 31, 2012 11:15am
Tid is too expensive over 1 dollar a share. 400m shares, 230m debt mere 40 rigs. I think Dawson may have over done it. Invigorated by his past success he has aggressively grown TID over a very short time, went on buying binge. He bought Warrior, Brazilian drilling with old rigs, then Caroil, which made TID debt laden and the slice got smaller. I think the focus on state of the art equipment with ...more  
Comment by dbeaude on Oct 31, 2012 7:53pm
Fortunately or unfortunately, Maurel and Prom owns 29% of the shares and Walter Dawson 10%. So a hostile bid is out of the question. These guys will be in control of how much they sell the company for not the buyer. Remember that though the market cap appears to be extremely cheap when compared to Book value of the companies assets, I like to look at enterprise value which is approximately $342 ...more  
Comment by totid on Oct 31, 2012 9:57pm
M&p and managment beween them have conrolling power. But When Caroil was bought by TID for some cash and shares, I think TId's share was around 1.50,but Dawson got his share as owner and founder and I did not think he bought it from his own pocket in open marlket so he makes money even if TID is sold for 30centes today. But Caroil's former owne will lose money unless ID is sold around ...more  
Comment by dbeaude on Oct 31, 2012 10:23pm
Before you post you should do some homework. M&P and Management and Directors own 39% (29% and 10%) of the issued and outstanding shares of the company and DO NOT have control. You and I do as the owners of 61%. It is very good from one perspective that 39 percent of the shares are taken off of the market as it reduces the float by over 100 million shares that reduce supply. Major ...more  
Comment by totid on Oct 31, 2012 11:05pm
Hi dbeaud: my comment of M&P and having control power was based on quick cal based on 29% for M&p, also Dawson I seem to rem owning about 34 mill shares that is over 8%.. and I did the rest of arthimetic wrong. I stand correct indeed all managment owns only 10% But question is will M&p sell for less than 1, hotile or friendly, that is below what caroil went for, so beween managmen 10 ...more  
Comment by dbeaude on Oct 31, 2012 11:31pm
No problem totid. Tuscany was the victim of an extremely underhanded move by HRT to just default on their agreements on their two very high margin heli-rigs. They also got two back from Parex in Trinidad. HRT in my opinion is run by low life management. Tuscany did not receive one notice of non performance before they unilaterally cancelled their agreement and Tuscany had to pay to get these rigs ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities