RE:RE:RE:RE:Oh the dramaFirstly, science pays attention to details. I never once gave a timing of the price... so you aren't paying attention.
Secondly, you say that fundamentals set the price; that's your hypothesis. So you tell me what the price will be this Friday and every Friday for the rest of the year. Stop shifting the burden of proof.
You give yourself lattitude to work within variables, and changes in fundamentals, yet you restrict technical analysis to exactitudes. Nobody claims technical analysis is exact, it is the balance of probabilities that you are referring to yourself.
No wonder you stick to fundamentals only, you'll always retroactively be able to explain why your expectations disappointed you. And you can always say, "fundamentals take a long to to prove out so I can't give you a good answer for short term trends.
But, having a soothing logic explanation for losing, is still losing.