TSX:TNT.UN - Post by User
Comment by
flamingogoldon Jul 28, 2024 4:55pm
88 Views
Post# 36151869
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Debt
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Debt"The stock didn't drop because the distribution was cut." What you argue is not incorrect except for your first line. Income investors want to get paid, that's what they care about first. Even when a company's payout ratio is above 100% and not sustainable, the stock will remain elevated as long as the payout continues. Cut that payout or worse, suspend it, and the stock will plummet. It happened here and the reverse will occur once a distribution gets re-instated.
luscar99 wrote: The stock didn't drop because the distribution was cut. It dropped because the distribution cut was a (late) admission by the management the distribution was unsustainable and the business has deteriorating at an accelerated pace.
The clear and undeniable relation between debt ratios and valuatios is shown in every comparative report. The REITs with lower debt ratio enjoy higher P/B and P/AFFO valuations.
Only debt reduction would help TNT's share price.
Reinstating a distribution while the business continues to deteriorate (AFFO has been going down, debt ratio has been going up in the last report) would worry market participants. That's one of the reasons the institutional investors are refraining from investing in TNT.