RE: RE: Sherbet, try not to embarrass yourselfHello FindingAG. It was a funny post for a funny clown- or fictional character.
Everyone on Stockhouse can see through Sherbet...below is a good post from UBS board given all indications that Sherbet is THE CLOWN OF STOCKHOUSE.
Sherbet...
Youhave made hundreds of posts here.. many seem more focussed on your loveof excrement and a certain orifice than on the affairs of this companyetc.. None are of any value.. absolutely none.
There is apattern to your rhetoric.. you take several sides of an issue within thefirst few weeks of it being discussed.. but because you talk in tonguesyou seem to think you can claim and disclaim accordingly.
Itsyour right to not trust me.. but its not your right to accuse me ofbeing out to rip off those I'm publicly putting my neck out to help.There is recourse available to me.. just liek the company can sue you orI or anyone else who makes any remarks they feel are out of line.
Thislittle world in which you inhabit where you've gotten away withflinging barbs at other entities, both large and small for years hasperhaps led you to believe it is indeed a free for all.. that you canslime who you like with no recourse or accountability forthcoming.
Youract is being used on number of other boards.. you pull the samenonsense.. you post trying to convince people there you know somethingthey don't.. yet you never say anything..
You post what isessentially insider connections (likely from Stockwatch) as if the facttow or three people in the same industry once held positions in the samecompany means something.. it doesn't Sherbie.. don't you get it? Thatrelationship is repeated thousands of times in the Canadian investmentindustry.. there are thousands of professional insiders moving from playto play.. the fact a few overlap is of no value.
If someonecomes up in your searches as working for or tied to a political partyyou then imply its a political conspiracy.. its fools logic.. and youcontinually trying to get some kind of credit for presenting it is justpathetic.
What is worse is you deliberately try and misleadpeople.. you try and convince them that you know soemething theydon't.. that there is more to the link .. you've even implied that Gerryadn Alex were chosen by or protected by government interests to act as"missionaires" thus they are protected.. sheer utter rubbish!.....
Response: Sherbet in part stated, orifice, beeeee, outch! ayoye!
Sherbet, think about it, after all, one knows you love it, eh