RE: GREAT HEADFAKEWow BigM, you're back, and with more insightful analysis to boot.
Your latest hypothesis that VIT is going to drop is especially useful. After all we saw well over 3 - 4x regular volume with only marginal fluctuation in the share price, which to most rationale folks means, yes some investors are taking modest profits but their profit seeking was offset by new demand. Thankfully BigM being rationale isn't a fate from which you suffer, thankfully you offer a deeper meaning to such intricate events. After all why would investors want to hold a position in VIT?
Do you perhaps have a career in prognosticating future events? I imagine you're a high profile broker somewhere but could also see you sitting amongst a haze of patchouli by your crystal ball, reading palms. Given the speculative nature of VIT's asset base (oh that's right VIT has a portfolio of strong, proven assets), poor leadership (darn, thats right management continues to demonstrate its savvy) and lack of market attention (swing and a miss yet again, sheesh there are some very strong institutional investors holding positions) I can easily see why your theory is plausible. . . errr no, no it isn't is it? Crikey, its not even rationale is it?
BigM maybe you should tame down your predictions to simpler more 'manageable' events, for example your bathroom breaks, taking your med's and the like.