RE:RE:VIT enters agreement to purchase ironOCB1234 wrote: "Through this agreement, we were able to secure more favourable pricing and terms than estimated in our recent Feasibility Study." I just compared the above statement with the Feas Study (below) and I don't see the cost savings McConnell refers to. What am I missing? https://www.vitgoldcorp.com/s/news_releases.asp?ReportID=764092
FS link: https://www.vitgoldcorp.com/i/pdf/reports/EG-NI%2043-101-oct-2016.pdf
See section 16.2.9. VIT used Komatsu equipment in the FS. CAT came up as being a better choice from financial point of view (without negative impact on reliability or quality of the equipment). Better pricing terms from CAT is a win-win for both CAT and VIT.
Some great news so far this week, more to come...
Good luck to all!