RE:RE:Nasdaq = reverse split 2 for 1 ?
I agree with Monty's comments. News about a Nasdaq listing has been all over the map in terms of the timing of it. Initially indications were prior to the end of this year; obviously that is not happening. At the 3rd quarter conferencing they were strangely quiet about the issue. Recall that they hired some guy strictly for the purpose of shepharding us through to a Nasdaq listing. Reading between the lines as to what is happening with the delay I suspect that they will easily qualify but are picking their point in time for the listing. That is why I think they were silent on the matter. It might have been unseemly to state specifically that they were holding off to a better time in the markets to maximize share price excitement over the new listing, etc. Perfectly legal, like minimizing income tax, but often better left unstated. While I think it is true that we will likely get a good bump from the listing on Nasdaq, we would surely likely to maximize the bump, and I doubt that can be achieved at this point in time, with the markets not favouring so-called tele-health or Covid or growth stocks. But maybe with some great news, as Monty has suggested, we can make a go of it.
In any event, I am certainly not an expert on the mechanics of Nasdaq listings, but those are my thoughts on the issue.