BudFoxxYou're a hard animal to figure out. I spent a half hour or so trying to establish your motives specifically with WELL ...right from the beginning. You wrote with passion, you were articulate, non contrarian, respectful and appeared quite enlightened and enlightening. You spoke highly of WELL, following the sector (and its relationship to covid) and not the company at first. You even bought into analyst assessment and fundamentals and clearly became a cheerleader for both the company and by inclusion, management. In fact I learned quite a bit ...so thank you.
Then, and all of a sudden and quite dramatically you went from someone many of your fellow investors respected and who clearl felt you were worth listening to, to being argumentative, bombastic and in some instances exceptionally volatile and rude. Why the switch?
As a teacher for over 30 years, now retired, I can say with some experience that ones ability to convey a meaningful message is done when being both forthright in conviction and respectful in delivery. Based on your own synopsis WELL is a great company, led by competent management and supported through investment by someone you admire in Li Ka Shing. While we may have yet to see the bottom of the sp , by your own admission the company on fundamentals is worth far more than $2/share. Like art where a painting is only worth what someone is willing to pay you are equally correct in stating that the sp of any stock at any one time is only valued at what an investor or group of investors is willing to pay for it ...that is the market can't be wrong.
Having said all this, if an investor (key the word invest and its meaning) is willing to pay $2 to $4 per share of WELL on the belief that analysts can be right and are arguably experts, fundamentals are fact and that bear markets do run their course ...not withstanding that medicine, because of covid and precovid concerns, is in the midst of a paradigm shift in delivery, is it not worth even a small investment in.