RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Paul at Denver GoldSeemed like a better interview - i was happy to see Paul at least mention VALUATION more in this interview ....although still not enough for my liking and not enough comparisons to typical ranges. I really liked his comment and seemed to imply from his standpoint we've derisked this enough that we should be trading higher...and i got the impression that MIGHT be the sticking point with negotiations with others partners where they are not giving us enough credit for what has already been done. In my opinion....that's why we need to drive up market cap NOW. I agree with others about the likely negotiations heating up....but like i've stated many times....I don't know how negotiations can really be close to wrapping anything up until our market cap increases greatly to allow the acquirer/partner to pony up what WE believe is "fair".
I pointed out to Sandy/Paul about some suggestions from a valuation standpoint (ie - trading at $0.007 /lb copper vs. a "normal" rate of $0.04 - $0.1 ; market cap to old dated FS about 5% - which in my opinoin we should be trading around 3 X that right now and about 5 X that rate for an acquistion typical , etc.
Response i got from Sandy was appreciative of the suggestions and that Western insiders agree with our assesment in the valuation proposal and exciting future...and that she has already posted the interview.